As the news cycle has been dominated continuously for the last couple of weeks with news of "the war in/on Iran", then obviously, the first question we must ask, as seasoned sceptics of psyops is, "is this real?"

The general consensus from conspiratorially-inclined critical thinkers appears to be, "no".

To clarify, to say the war is "fake", or a psyop, is not to say there is nothing happening at all: clearly, there are a few pyrotechnic displays going on; some missile strikes conveniently targeting deserted housing complexes scheduled for demolition whilst avoiding all major infrastructure and other key strategy sites; and likely some real injuries and deaths - after all, people do really get hurt on movie sets.

But a movie set is nevertheless what it very much appears to be, with one researcher observing:

"The footage looked like a Star Wars movie. I mean that literally. There were explosions everywhere, and like, lasers…and you are sitting there watching it thinking — what the shit?…Something is off here. Because it did not look like a war.

It looked like someone had a very generous effects budget and absolutely zero interest in making it look real."

This is the standard signature of the psyop: that the world-class directors and producers behind such productions, with access to infinite budgets and all the best tech, make their psyop sets look fake and unbelievable on purpose.

Conversely, if you go to the cinema to watch the latest war epic, it always looks all too real. Indeed, combat veterans reported that the opening scenes of Saving Private Ryan were so realistic, they were unable to watch them.

So it's not that the black magic sorcerers behind the scenes lack the ability to make fake events look real: it's that they intentionally don't do so when staging a psyop, for two key reasons.

The first is that by making their deception readily apparent, they are not forcibly misleading you: rather, they are showing you clearly that the event is fake, meaning that if you choose to believe in it anyway, and behave as if the illusion is real, that's on you: you have consented to the deception.

We do appear to live in a consent-based system, and so the ruling classes always require it from us to ensure their various deceptive schemes - wars, pandemics, terror attacks, etc. - successfully become part of the global narrative. Obviously, if the majority of us just rolled our eyes and said, "nice try, but this obviously isn't real", these staged events would hold no power.

The second reason for such obvious fakery is to fulfil propaganda's key purpose: humiliation. The psychopathic ruling classes love to mock and humiliate their victims, and requiring the masses to behave as if they believe in something that is very obviously fake, is a key part of the propagandist ritual. As Theodore Dalrymple said:

"[T]he purpose of communist propaganda was not to persuade or convince, nor to inform, but to humiliate; and therefore, the less it corresponded to reality the better. When people are forced to remain silent when they are being told the most obvious lies, or even worse when they are forced to repeat the lies themselves, they lose once and for all their sense of probity. To assent to obvious lies is to co-operate with evil, and in some small way to become evil oneself. One’s standing to resist anything is thus eroded, and even destroyed. A society of emasculated liars is easy to control."

The "war in Iran" very much appears to be adhering to these rules, and is little more than a performative soap opera, played out in large parts - as today's soap operas often are - on social media.

As one critic observed:

"The US, Israel, and Iran are all equally culpable. All 3 announcing strikes hours in advance on Twitter is not warfare, it is to give the illusion of warfare to those gullible enough to believe it."

The aforementioned countries are not really enemies run by warring factions, but part of a globalist power network all controlled by the same people, working towards the same goals, for the same reasons. Iran is not some renegade outlier, it is a fully signed-up member of the lockstep global agenda, and entirely ensconced in the club.

We can easily discern this to be true this from the facts that Iran participated in the Covid pantomime, has widely installed 5G technology and is working towards 6G, and has a 'robust' childhood vaccination programme (including giving the tuberculosis and Hepatitis B vaccinations at birth).

So, Iran is demociding its population and stealing its children's futures in just the same way the Western countries it is supposedly "at war" with are: so why are they (allegedly) at war?

Well, there's the old "they have weapons of mass destruction" (or will have them soon) trope. The Trump administration has claimed Iran is 'a week away' from having a nuclear weapon, a claim which Iran has denied. I believe their denial, since I don't believe nukes are real.

They're just more fabricated fear propaganda.

As 'covid' demonstrated to us so ably, you don't need a real threat to optimally control a population: you just need the fear of one.

Whether or not you believe "there was a virus" (I don't), what is unanimously clear is that there was no increased threat to health or life in 2020 as compared to any other year. All that happened is that, in 2020, people who would, in previous years, have been admitted to hospital for flu or pneumonia, were labelled as covid patients instead, then inappropriately treated with ventilators, midazolam, and other drugs.

These dangerous treatment protocols caused some excess deaths, which were consequently attributed to "the virus", and it became common practice to put 'covid' on a death certificate, even when a patient had been terminally ill with other conditions, and when a covid test hadn't been performed (not that said tests were anything other than useless theatre props).

So the point is, there was no increased threat to anyone's health or safety in 2020 from "a novel virus" (which in my opinion didn't even exist), but there didn't need to be: people simply needed to believe that there was, and then they modified their behaviour accordingly.

It's the same with nuclear weapons: they don't need to really exist in order for the ruling classes to use their threat to control people through fear: people simply need to believe that they do.

So, the nominal reason for the war on Iran is "they're getting nukes", with a secondary, supporting reason being the need to topple their evil dictator leaders.

Already, a key movie baddie - Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei - has reportedly been killed off, and this, apparently, could be Iran's Berlin Wall moment.

The Guardian reports:

"Khamenei, 86, sat atop Iran’s Islamic power structure for 37 years – nearly a decade longer than the Berlin Wall lasted. As the senior religious authority in the country’s system of velayat-e faqih – rule by Islamic jurisprudence adopted after the 1979 Islamic revolution – he had the final say on all state matters.

His sudden and violent removal leaves a political vacuum that serving members of the regime may struggle to fill."

The Guardian continues:

"[Iranian scholar] Milani said the regime’s surviving elements no longer possessed the means or the power of intimidation over the populace to hold power by fear alone.

“You need an apparatus of oppression,” he said. “They don’t have enough people willing to kill for them. They still have some but they have lost that focused will that allowed, for example, the Communist party in China to survive after Tiananmen Square.

“And you need a population that is frightened. Fear has dissipated. In Iran, when fear dissipates, authoritarian and pseudo-totalitarian regimes can’t survive.”

In short, this is the precursor for the Islamic theocratic rule in Iran being overthrown, a regime which has been vigorously challenged both in Iran and around the world since the Iranian revolution in 1979.

The official story goes that, prior to 1979, Iran was "a rapidly modernising, pro-Western monarchy under Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, characterised by significant social liberalisation, secularisation, and oil-fuelled economic growth", but that, after 1979, "transformed from a secular monarchy to a strict theocratic Islamic Republic, enforcing mandatory hijabs, gender segregation, and Islamic law".

The population, women especially, are said to be brutally oppressed, with the regime renowned for "a combination of mandatory morality laws, severe judicial punishment, and violent suppression of dissent, particularly targeting women, ethnic minorities, and LGBTQ+ individuals". Excessive and lethal force, torture, and sexual assault are said to be commonplace.

That sounds like a pretty despicable Muslim regime, right? I mean, isn't this just more evidence of how thoroughly evil Islam is, and how we need to stamp it out?

Well... not quite.

Look a bit deeper at the "Muslim" power structures in Iran, and guess what you find...

The Iranian rulers are not really Muslim at all: they're Jewish.

What supremacist organised Jewry has done, with both Islam and Christianity alike, is infiltrate the religions with a view to making them appear so unpalatable - so destructive, violent, and tyrannical - that the world gets behind their mutual destruction.

The destruction of Christianity is already well underway in Western countries, especially the UK, where it is increasingly viewed as a repressive relic which does nothing but constrain and control people, whilst enabling mass institutionalised paedophilia - and the destruction of Islam in Eastern countries is undergoing a similarly targeted destruction.

The point of the "war on Iran" is to get the world behind the same regime change there that has already happened, or is planned to soon happen, everywhere else: the destruction of the target country's unifying religion and morality, to be replaced by global libertine communism. As John Lennon, Tavistock change agent, prophetically warbled: "no religions, no countries, and no possessions". No genders or families, either. That's the desired future, globally.

At present, there isn't much mass support for - or even interest in - the war in Iran (apart from the effect we're told it'll have on petrol prices) - so, in order to get Western audiences more engaged in the action, the scriptwriters need to bring it closer to home: therefore, expect some major "Iranian terror attack", probably aimed at "the Jewish community", to be unleashed in London or New York or some other central, suitably celluloid location, very soon.

It will be fake, as I wrote about before, but the public will be expected to behave as if it is real.

The social controllers are already prepping us for this, by claiming plots against British Jews by "Iranian terror cells" have been foiled by police, but that a successful attack soon is more or less inevitable...

They may even go for the big (orange) one, of having Iran be seen to "assassinate Trump", to really kick off some cinematic chaos (and consequently, instal JD Vance in the top job, which I believe is key to their goal of ultimately undermining Christianity in the USA).

Whatever treacherous tricks they come up with - and they will - the key thing to always ask ourselves, before becoming emotionally invested in any reported event, is, "is this real?" - and assume, until there's compelling evidence to the contrary, that it isn't.

Always remember that the world is a stage, war is theatre, and social media is a soap opera - and proceed accordingly.

Thanks for reading! This site is entirely reader-powered, with no paywalls, adverts, or wealthy corporate backers, making it truly independent. Your support is therefore crucial to ensuring this site's continued existence. If you'd like to make a contribution to help this site keep going, please consider...

1. Subscribing monthly via Patreon or Substack (where paid subscribers can comment on posts)

2. Making a one-off contribution via BuyMeACoffee

3. Contributing in either way via bank transfer to Nat West account number 30835984, sort code 54-10-27, account name FINCH MA (please use your email address as a reference if you'd like me to acknowledge receipt).

Your support is what allows this site to continue to exist and is enormously appreciated. Thank you.