In common with, it seems, nearly the entire Western world, I was rather saddened to hear last week of the demise of veteran actor, Patrick Stewart.

Yes, I know he was a luvvie celeb who had associations with some very questionable people, and I'm sure there's some deep dive on him somewhere alleging he's a freemason illuminati reptilian (and secretly trans, natch), but I still can't help feel a little saddened by his passing, as he played such an iconic role in my childhood.

I was glued to BBC Two, every Wednesday evening at 6pm, for my weekly fix of the extraterrestrial adventures of the starship Enterprise, as headed by Captain Jean-Luc Picard - whose understated charm I always found rather preferable to the interminable smugness of James T. Kirk (even though it is Captain Kirk's endeavours that inspired my Miri AF avatar).

I watched avidly as Captain Picard boldly (and indeed baldly) commanded his ship to explore new strange worlds and to seek out new life and new civilisations, all whilst he maintained his ongoing coy flirtation with Dr. Beverley Crusher - accompanied by regular interruptions from world's-most-annoying-child, Wesley (sorry, Wesley, and you were very good in Stand By Me).

I enjoyed Picard's filial camaraderie with Commander Riker, his 'Number One' (or 'Number Two', as the evil Q would scathingly call him), as well as his gently amused interactions with the always slightly bewildered Data.

Overall, I was thoroughly taken in by the delights of The Next Generation universe (and yes, I know now that the Star Trek franchise is subversive propaganda to proliferate communism and that Gene Roddenberry was a satanist, but I hadn't quite worked all that out at the age of eight).

So, as I've always had quite the affection for Mr Stewart, I was pleasantly surprised to learn, when I moved to Huddersfield seven years ago, that he originated from just down the road, in Mirfield (a place I can't help but read as 'Miri Field').

Sir Stewart has long been known to frequent Huddersfield's local pubs, and The Sportsman near the train station has a framed photo of him to commemorate his many visits.

So, given all this history and resonance, I was a bit sad to hear he had made his final exit stage left, and especially to hear what he died of - Alzheimer's disease (and Lewy body dementia).

As he's reported to have had a "short" battle with the condition, and given that it does not kill quickly (one of its many cruelties), it's been speculated Stewart actually had an assisted death, and that he had drawn up an agreement with doctors in advance, stipulating that, if he were ever to be diagnosed with dementia, he would want to be assisted to quickly end his life, never suffering the worst ravages of the condition.

We can't know if that's definitely true, but I think it's extremely likely that it is.

While I'm wholly against assisted dying, I can certainly sympathise with why someone faced with an Alzheimer's diagnosis might opt for an assisted death. So the news of Patrick Stewart's demise has made me think, once again, about the scourge of Alzheimer's disease, and how it has been successfully reframed (just as other modern conditions have) as a natural, normal life stage.

That, if you live long enough, a dementia diagnosis is verging on the inevitable (the condition is now the UK's biggest killer).

Yet, as for other conditions, this framing isn't actually remotely accurate: Alzheimer's disease isn't a natural, normal consequence of human ageing, and, like so many other modern illnesses, has in fact been engineered and induced by modern poisons.

That means it's avoidable (and, potentially, reversible).

As the vilified, smeared, and cancelled scientist, Dr. Christopher Exley put it plainly:

"No aluminium, no Alzheimer's."

Dr. Exley has conducted extensive trials demonstrating the sky-high levels of aluminium in the brains of those with Alzheimer's disease (and other modern conditions like autism), and has shown that reducing aluminium levels in the body can reduce Alzheimer's symptoms.

If aluminium levels are kept low enough throughout life, then, Dr Exley posits, Alzheimer's would never develop at all.

This line of research, along with Exley's work showing the connection between aluminium and autism, was so threatening to the establishment that they did everything they could to destroy his career, including multiple hit pieces in the press (here, here, and here), cutting off all his funding avenues, and, ultimately, terminating his career.

A key player in this trajectory was none other than Mr Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

It is now, in alternative health communities, generally a known and accepted fact that "Bobby" is just another traitor and controlled op, posing as one of the good guys when he was working for the dark side all along. I was initially taken in by him myself (more of which shortly), but soon began to see through him, and issued warnings in several articles, such as this one in 2023 and this one in 2024.

I had some very brief contact with Bobby myself in 2020, owing to his support of the aforementioned scientist, Chris Exley. I knew Chris, and had done since 2015, because he was a professor on the university campus, Keele, where I grew up. When I began to advocate for raising awareness of vaccine dangers, he was kind enough to give me some of his time to share what he knew about the damage done by aluminium adjuvants.

Chris was trying very hard to fundraise to conduct further studies into risks of these adjuvants, but his university was blocking him at every turn (I wrote up the full story here). Learning about his plight, and apparently wanting to support the research, Bobby Kennedy decided to send a personal cheque for $15,000 to help fund further study.

Keele University refused to accept the cheque, owing to Bobby's infamy, and the 'reputational damage' they alleged an association with him could do to Keele.

At the time, I was horrified by Keele's decision, and wrote to them to inform of this fact, a letter which Bobby quoted extensively in his own article on the subject.

I wrote to him to thank him for his efforts, he replied to thank me for my thanks - and that marked the beginning and end of my relationship with him, and indeed with the entire Kennedy dynasty (just in case any of my detractors would like to try and tediously misrepresent the nature or significance of my exchanging two emails with the man six years ago).

It was what happened very soon after this that dramatically changed my impression of Mr Kennedy.

The conflict Chris Exley was undergoing with Keele University rapidly escalated after Bobby's intervention, to the extent it ultimately led to the termination of his employment, and, consequently, the closure of the very last research unit in the UK focusing on aluminium and the harm it causes to human health.

In light of everything we now know about Bobby Kennedy, I have come to the conclusion that it is entirely possible and plausible that this was the planned and intended consequence of his 'gift' all along.

When he made this donation, Bobby knew that the university was looking for any excuse to shut down Chris's research. So, he made what could very much be construed as a calculated decision, to offer what was, in the context - and for a man worth around $15 million - a relatively small sum, that would not be enough to power a study of the type Chris was looking to undertake (I haven't got a direct quote from Chris on this, but I've asked other academics and they estimated a total cost of around £100,000), whilst simultaneously handing powerful ammunition to the university to penalise Chris for his associations with such a "controversial" character.

And boy, did they use it. They rejected the cheque (meaning Bobby wasn't out of pocket one red cent), and used the situation to ultimately end Chris's career.

The whole situation was therefore a huge win for the establishment and a catastrophic blow for independent science and human health.

So, now that we know which team Bobby really bats for, how likely is it that his 'gift' was ever really benevolent?

Is it not more likely that it was, from the start, a coordinated stitch-up, designed to have precisely the shattering effects that it has had?

I'd like to emphasise this is my own theory, and there is no suggestion it's shared or endorsed by Chris Exley, with whom I have not discussed it (but if you'd like to know what he's up to these days, please do visit his Substack).

While we can't ultimately be sure of Bobby Kennedy's true motives for proffering this money, what we can be sure of is that exposing the dangers of aluminium to human health is hugely threatening to the establishment. It's quite clear why it would be, when one considers that it is the ravages of aluminium that are responsible for the condition named as the UK's leading cause of death.

Clearly, such avid and avowed depopulationists as our ruling classes would be very invested in ensuring these ravages continue.

The good news is there remains lots we can do to reduce our own body burdens of aluminium and therefore greatly reduce our chances of developing Alzheimer's disease, or other degenerative conditions associated with the metal.

These include avoiding nonstick cookware, aluminium-containing personal care products, and tap water (aluminium is added to municipal water supplies, supposedly to improve clarity - and it was an overdose of aluminium to the water supply that resulted in the infamous Camelford poisoning scandal, the worst mass poisoning incident in British history).

The most acute exposure any of us ever have to aluminium, however, comes through vaccines, several of which use it as an adjuvant, so that's reason 759286 to avoid any and all vaccines.

(Please note those numbers were picked entirely at random and have no inherent meaning, because I just know there's someone sitting there right now adding them up to see what they come to... 37, by the way.)

It's not possible to avoid aluminium completely, but it is possible to actively remove the aluminium we have accumulated over the years through regular consumption of naturally silica-rich waters which bind with aluminium in the body and safely flush it out. Any mineral water with a silica content of 30ppm or more on the label will suffice, which includes Volvic and Fiji in the UK, and many others around the world as listed in this book (some people claim that various other forms of silica, such as supplements, horsetail, and diatomaceous earth, are equally as effective at detoxing aluminium, but Chris Exley says he has tested them all in his lab and they're not).

To end on a particularly celebratory note (there's not always quite as much jubilance and celebration in my articles as I might like, and the festive season is nearly upon us, after all), there is one other way of effectively removing aluminium from the body, which is as or more effective that silica-rich water.

Beer.

Yes, I kid thee not, although admittedly, only certain types of beer. Lagers don't generally meet the threshold, but ales do, and in particular, IPAs. IPAs are very high in extremely bioavailable silica, and flush aluminium out very effectively.

Consequently, there is even a known association between drinking beer and a lower risk of Alzheimer''s disease.

Of course, I must now add a tedious and condescending disclaimer that this isn't medical advice or endorsement of dangerous heavy drinking (it's always best to do your heavy drinking safely), but just an important piece of intriguing scientific information for you to do with as you will.

What you may wish to do with it is pop into your nearest real ale pub - like Patrick Stewart's regular, The Sportsman in Huddersfield - and protect your future neurological health with a pint of IPA (and, for the designated drivers, non-alcoholic versions work too).

As for Bobby Kennedy? He doesn't drink, so a pint of their finest tap water for him...

Thanks for reading! This site is entirely reader-powered, with no paywalls, adverts, or wealthy corporate backers, making it truly independent. Your support is therefore crucial to ensuring this site's continued existence. If you'd like to make a contribution to help this site keep going, please consider...

1. Subscribing monthly via Patreon or Substack (where paid subscribers can comment on posts)

2. Making a one-off contribution via BuyMeACoffee

3. Contributing in either way via bank transfer to Nat West account number 30835984, sort code 54-10-27, account name FINCH MA (please use your email address as a reference if you'd like me to acknowledge receipt).

Your support is what allows this site to continue to exist and is enormously appreciated. Thank you.