I refer here not to life, nor even to Volodymyr Zelensky, but to the proposed next stage of the agenda: the (scripted, stage-managed) swing to the hard right.

I've spoken about this before, and the accelerating social and political cues indicating this is where our evil overlords intend to take us next, but today, I want to explore the planned longevity of this phase - or rather, the lack of it.

Multiple countries in the Western world are showing an increasing shift to political and social conservatism, including more extreme interpretations of it, such as ethno-nationalism.

Growing movements in countries including the US, UK, France, Spain, Germany, Italy, and Hungary, reflect increased support for right-wing concerns, principally surrounding immigration, and the idea of national identity.

In addition, non-traditional family structures are attracting increasingly negative attention, and there is a growing movement working to re-recognise traditional marriage as the optimal environment for raising children.

Women's rights are also under the spotlight, as a direct result of the ultra high-profile Lindsay Clancy case, and the widespread female support the alleged murderer mother has received.

All of this means (especially if the West goes to war, as commentators increasingly suggest it will) that voters are more likely than ever to vote for right-wing parties. This is especially pertinent in light of the news this week that Downing Street advisors are pushing for an early General Election.

Eyes on the Anglosphere

Focusing on the US and UK - the two most powerful of the so-called 'Five Eyes' nations, that plot and determine world events - we can expect to see, before the end of the decade, a Reform administration in the UK and a JD Vance presidency in the US (this could happen before the next scheduled presidential elections in 2028, were Trump to "die" before then).

Were these tandem administrations to take power, then, as I have argued previously, the whole Western cultural climate would flip into a Handmaid's Tale style dystopia, where women, gays, and ethnic minorities became second-class citizens, subject to increasing discrimination, inequality, and even brutality.

Reform has already promised that, were they in power, they would overturn various human rights legislation "on day one", by scrapping the Equality Act, abolishing the Human Rights Act, and withdrawing the UK from the European Convention on Human Rights. Although these moves have been spun to the public as being vital steps in tackling immigration, in reality, they will have many more far-reaching and undesirable consequences.

For example, it was invoking the Equality Act during 'covid' that allowed us to remain mask-free without facing official sanctions or penalty fines (and indeed, being able to impose such fines on others, should they attempt to breach our rights to remain mask-free, or ask for 'proof' of our mask-exempt status).

Repealing these Acts could also feasibly lead to mass discrimination in the workplace, by legalising prejudice against certain groups, such as pregnant women and those over a certain age, as well as allowing landlords to refuse tenancy to, for example, single mothers. Rights to freedom of expression and political protest could also be affected.

In short, these Acts pertain to a lot more than just immigration.

Nigel Farage made quite clear recently, in a rousing Facebook rant, that he would tolerate no opposition in his mission to radically overhaul the UK, and would, if necessary, "declare a state of emergency" to allow him to function as an all-powerful dictator, suspending ordinary democratic process and imposing his extremist ideology by force.

The (intended) corollary of this would be to greatly embolden those people who possess extreme right-wing sensibilities, and to encourage them to express themselves in increasingly exaggerated and overbearing ways.

They would be given the messaging that the authoritarian right now represents the dominant power structure in this country, and so, undisguised displays of intolerance and aggression towards those on the political left, and/or minorities, are now acceptable and even commendable. "We're in control now and there's nothing you libtards / feminazis / poofters can do about it", would be the general thrust of it. There would be plenty of agent provocateurs inserted into any political situation to encourage and inflame this.

The purpose of this manoeuvring would be to equip the political left with a huge avalanche of evidence to say, in essence, "we told you so": that, far from possessing sensible, moderate concerns on issues like immigration and family breakdown, those with right-wing sensibilities are, in reality, dangerous brutes who, as soon as they are given the slightest sniff of power, reveal themselves for the tyrannical oppressors they really are.

This would inevitably prompt many who had previously considered themselves on the right to recoil in horror at what they saw the right mutating into, and they would increasingly distance themselves, moving further and further to the left, as suddenly, the left would appear the reasonable, compassionate, tolerant ones (a reverse of the experience many had during 'covid').

That's why we're seeing the promotion of extreme and exaggerated right-wing rhetoric now: it's a form of strategic pied piperism to, ultimately, put people off right-wing ideologies for good.

Turning of the tide

It is said that cultures rise and fall in roughly 80-year increments, divided into four twenty-year "turnings", meaning we are therefore at the tail-end of the fourth and final "turning" of modern Western history. This era began after the second world war, with a global demonising of nationalist, traditionalist values as promoted by the Nazis, and what these supposedly lead to - brutality, genocide, horror - and will end that way, too (and may well involve another world war).

In short, the "right-wing dictatorship" phase of modern history we are about to enter into is supposed to have the same effects on the populace that the rise of Nazi Germany did: to make us shudder in revulsion at the very words "right-wing", in the same way it's installed into us from birth to react to the word 'Nazi' - and thus, to ensure there is a collective worldwide chorus of "never again".

"These traditionalist, conservative ideas are too dangerous. .Just look at the kind of tyrants they create. Measures must be taken to ensure such deranged despots can never ascend to power again."

Enter stage left, global communism...

That's the plan.

I write this not to depress anyone, but as a caution, while there is still time, not to fall into baited traps. The fact that more anti-liberal movements are appearing to go mainstream, and attract increasing momentum and votes, is not the triumph it appears to be, and those spearheading these movements are not to be trusted.

For example, the leader of Germany's hard right AfD party, Alice Weidel, who alleges to vehemently oppose immigration, gay marriage, and gay adoption... is herself a married lesbian with a Sri Lankan partner raising adopted children.

This is one of the most transparent indicators there is that the "far right" leaders and would-be leaders of the West are simply cunning cosplayers: they are leftist actors portraying hard-right villains on the world stage, in exactly the same way Joseph Fiennes and Yvonne Strahovski do in The Handmaid's Tale.

Fiennes and Stahovski portray extremist right-wing zealots in this fictional show: in reality, they are committed leftists.

In the above-linked interview, Fiennes confirms that The Handmaid's Tale is effectively left-wing agitprop, designed to spook the viewer into being truly terrified of what a right-wing administration could mean. He also confirms the show is meant to "mimic real life".

So, top establishment actors are already telling us that's what they do - when they want to demonise and destroy something, they present the most extreme and distorted versions of it to the global audience via the world stage.

And that's exactly what these high-profile "far-right" political movements are doing - which is even confirmed by recent news coverage showing that 'Germany’s AfD is so extreme it’s putting off other far-right parties'.

This is entirely intentional and strategic, meant to cause further fissures and ruptures in the right, as these high-profile establishment parties are intentionally trying to mischaracterise the political and cultural right as so unpalatable, that, ultimately, no reasonable people are going to adopt or continue it, and will instead react with revulsion and swing further and further left. This especially goes for the young, who are the future of any nation.

This is exactly how social engineers sculpted the Boomers after World War II, and it worked so well, it is simply being recycled for the incoming generation of under-30s.

The over-40s (who make up the bulk of supporters for parties like AfD and Reform) will increasingly be depicted as backwards, bigoted relics, just like the older generations were in the 1960s, whilst the youth will be courted and manipulated by sophisticated propaganda encouraging them to clamour for a communist future.

This is particularly pertinent when one considers that giving the vote to 16 and 17 year olds was part of Labour's 2024 election manifesto. If Andy Burnham manages to implement that before he goes, then - especially as older voters increasingly die off, courtesy of all the covid and flu injections - voter behaviour in the 2030s could look very different to voter behaviour of today.

What it seems we can expect to see in the near future is a snap General Election called in around May 2027, which will result - as forecast by predictive programming, Years and Years, and as confirmed by recent polling - in a hung parliament.

Various offers to enter into a coalition in order to form a government will subsequently be rejected: Nigel Farage has already confirmed that he - just like Years and Years 'Viv Rook', who is openly modelled on Farage - would reject a coalition offer from the Tories.

“I would never do a deal with a party that I do not trust,” he said. “No deals, just a reverse takeover.”

With the government in stalemate, another General Election would likely be called, where (again, as predicted by Years and Years) voting could be made compulsory.

Were this to occur, then the combined factors of populist parties already tending to have a lot of support amongst non-voters, along with non-voters wanting to punish the arm of the establishment (Labour) that has 'made' them vote, means the result would very likely be a sweeping victory for Reform.

This manoeuvring would ensure a solid Reform parliamentary majority - therefore making them the very definition of the establishment - whilst still preserving their 'anti-establishment' image amongst their base: "Haha, that establishment lackey Burnham tried to force his way back into power through making people vote, and look how it's backfired on him!"

It's really quite clever. Decent, if derivative - borrowed as it is straight from Years and Years - scriptwriting.

And it's at that point that the "Volodymyr Zelensky" stage of modern British history would begin.

Let's just hope that Führer Farage spares us any "unconventional" piano concertos...

Thanks for reading! This site is entirely reader-powered, with no paywalls, adverts, or wealthy corporate backers, making it truly independent. Your support is therefore crucial to ensuring this site's continued existence. If you'd like to make a contribution to help this site keep going, please consider...

1. Subscribing monthly via Patreon or Substack (where paid subscribers can comment on posts)

2. Making a one-off contribution via BuyMeACoffee

3. Contributing in either way via bank transfer to Nat West account number 30835984, sort code 54-10-27, account name FINCH MA (please use your email address as a reference if you'd like me to acknowledge receipt).

Your support is what allows this site to continue to exist and is enormously appreciated. Thank you.