Following his recent sentencing (there were no obvious 33s apparent, but it was delivered on 9/11), the alleged rapes of Russell Brand continue to dominate news headlines and inflame social media ire. Whilst perusing the polarised pandemonium ("he's an evil rapist!" "oh no he isn't!" "Oh yes he is!"), I happened upon a post asking of Brand:

"Am I imagining it or does this guy seem like an actor?"

Well, no, the poster is not imagining it. On the contrary: that Brand is a professionally trained actor is a matter of documented fact, as he is an alumni of London's prestigious Italia Conti drama school (the school is named for its founder, Italia Emily Stella Conti, more of whom later).

By the time he entered the elite theatre school, Brand had already undertaken work as a film extra, thereby strongly suggesting - for such a competitive and often closed-shop industry - that he already possessed powerful insider connections.

Interestingly, the specific title or name of Brand's first film extra role has never been publicly divulged, so we cannot further investigate what or who might have given him his start.

The official story of Brand's youth goes that, after gaining admission to Italia Conti (where he was considered so talented, his fees were covered by the local council), he was soon expelled for drug use and poor attendance, whilst he himself has alleged sexual abuse by a tutor.

Is this exit story true, or is it just part of his seeded backstory, to create the image of tortured delinquent rebel that was apparently so captivating to so many? Even The Guardian concedes that the official story of Brand's youth is so "eye-popping" it comes across as "a performance".

Tony Brown, a former classmate of Brand's at Italia Conti, has spoken to the press of his alleged recollections, sharing with newspapers that Brand: "stood out instantly" with this high quiff and Cockney accent - and said Brand was "overly confident". Tony said that Brand had the "charisma to carry off anything", which is why he rarely got in trouble for his "sexual nature". He said that Brand would often stalk the girls' corridors, and Tony claims he even groped some younger pupils in the dining hall. Tony claimed that Brand made multiple sexual comments about two former celebrity pupils and often said: "I will have them; they just don't know it yet". Tony said school staff "ignored" Brand's behaviour and that he feels guilty for not challenging him."

Bear in mind that, as a fellow alumni of Italia Conti, Tony Brown, like Brand, is a professionally trained performance artist, so whether we can believe a word he says or whether he is simply part of this particular performance meant to ratify Brand's character arc, we can only speculate upon.

This article's title refers to MI5, not because I know for sure that Brand worked for that particular agency, but as a nod to the fact that intelligence assets often do brief stints at educational establishments to make their trajectory to success look organic and real, but swiftly find reasons to drop out (or be kicked out) so they can get on with their real business as quickly as possible.

This story arc applies to Charlie Kirk, Candace Owens, and Mark Zuckerberg, amongst others. Several educational institutes are also known to have agreements with intelligence agencies to provide 'cover' whilst an asset is in training, which appears to have been the case with Barack Obama and Rishi Sunak (both of whom claim to have attended universities where nobody remembers them).

While Russell Brand does genuinely appear to have attended Italia Conti, his attendance was brief enough to suggest it is all part of his character's concocted backstory, as I strongly suspect Russell Brand was and is an intelligent asset, born into a family with the right allegiances and connections (see his early film success) to propel him very rapidly into the establishment's upper echelons. Note that he released his bestselling autobiography, that even garnered an extensive review in the New York Times, at the age of just 32.

Leading on from this, I believe it is highly likely and probable that Italia Conti, Brand's alma mater, is some sort of intelligence agency offshoot for training the icons and performers of tomorrow: those people who are so crucial for manipulating public perception as the intelligence agencies and social architects desire.

A brief glance at the academy's alumni list reads like a modern celebrity Who's Who, featuring such names as Naomi Campbell, Sharon Osbourne, and Kelly Brook, as well as many and various soap and pop stars.

Such people are vital for social engineering operations, and I don't believe the social engineers leave their training to chance.

Naomi Campbell, for instance, has been instrumental in pushing the late single motherhood by surrogacy agenda, as un-partnered Campbell famously acquired two children in her fifties born via surrogate.

Sharon Osbourne is an internationally known name thanks to her marriage to Ozzy and their eponymous reality TV show, who has, amongst other things, used her high profile to promote toxic jab Ozempic.

Kelly Brook has been a reality TV staple for decades, promoting and normalising whatever the agenda of the day is - including covid.

Soap star scions such as Letitia Dean (Sharon from Eastenders) and Johnny Briggs (Coronation Street's Mike Baldwin) also attended Italia Conti, and the specific purpose of soap operas is to sculpt societies by introducing and normalising new trends, i.e., to socially engineer. Both Eastenders and Coronation Street, for instance, integrated "the covid pandemic" into their storylines.

When we delve more deeply into the history and founding of Italia Conti, we find some further interesting detail. The school was established after the eponymous Italia Conti was asked by the Eton alumni, actor Sir Charles Hawtrey, to train children to act in his play Where The Rainbow Ends.

The play is described as: "a fantasy story which follows the journey of four children, two girls, two boys and a pet lion cub in search of their parents. Travelling on a magic carpet they face various dangers on their way to rescue their parents and are guarded and helped by Saint George. The rainbow story is a symbol of hope with its magic carpet of faith and its noble hero St. George of England in shining armour ready now, as in olden times, to fight and conquer the dragon of evil. Most of the story is set in ‘Rainbow Land’ complete with talking animals, mythical creatures and even a white witch."

The first performance of Where The Rainbow Ends took place on the highly occult Winter Solstice - 21st December, 1911.

The children in the initial cast included a 12-year-old Noël Coward as well as Esmé Wynne-Tyson, Hermione Gingold and Philip Tonge. In its first few years, many future stars also performed in the play, including Gertrude Lawrence, Nora Swinburne, Jack Hawkins and Brian Aherne.

Most readers of this article will be familiar with the significance of the phrase "over the rainbow" and its link to MK Ultra mind control programmes targeted at children. As one source puts it:

"The Wizard of Oz was used in MK Ultra programs by the CIA as part of Project Monarch which is used to brainwash children. The subject would disassociate from the pain inflicted on them by going “over the rainbow” creating a fractured personality. This was a continuation of the Nazi experiments of Joseph Mengele from WW2. These scientists were imported into the allied nations following the war in something called Operation Paperclip."

So, a play entitled 'Where The Rainbow Ends' featuring multiple children who went on to become stars, and that marked the inception of the Italia Conti drama school where many future influential names were trained, certainly gives us pause for thought.

To return to Russell Brand, his suspected links with MK Ultra extend far beyond his schooldays, and to, in particular, his famed relationship with the singer, Katy Perry.

Now dating former Canadian Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau (also credibly rumoured to be a victim of MK Ultra mind control), Perry was married to Brand for 14 months from October 2010 to July 2012.

That Brand was some sort of 'handler' of Perry, using mind control techniques and trigger words to manipulate her behaviour, is effectively a matter of documented fact, with even The Independent newspaper reporting that:

"Over the weekend, disturbing footage of the couple arriving at the Vanity Fair Oscars Party in 2010 circulated online, suggesting an uncomfortable dynamic between the pair, who had then only been dating for a few months. 

In the clip, a reporter from ITV’s morning show GMTV asks Perry for her thoughts on the Academy Awards ceremony, only for Brand to hold up and tap a badge that reads “Obey”. Perry then falls silent, and it is Brand’s views that the journalist ends up hearing."

Katy Perry's 'Wide Awake' music video, a song which Perry states was inspired by her divorce from Brand, is said by some sources to be about the Monarch mind control programme. The influence of MK Ultra and Monarch mind control on celebrity culture is well-known.

While we cannot know with ultimate certainty which aspects of Brand's own stated biography are true and which are fabricated as part of his character arc, it is notable that Brand has alleged being sexually abused as a child, both as an adolescent at Italia Conti drama school, and as a seven-year-old by a "private tutor".

If true, this background would be entirely consistent with a child who is being subjected to MK Ultra style conditioning and mind control for a future highly influential role on the world stage.

And Brand has certainly proved to be highly influential. Whatever happens to him now - whether he appeals his sentence, whether he "dies" in prison, or whatever tumultuous plot twist comes next - he has already had the profound impact upon culture it seems his character was always intended to have.

A grotesque parody of the arch seducer, attracting the dubious honour of 'Shagger of the Year' multiple times (Brand appeared to model himself on a combination of Oliver Twist's Fagin and the Russian occultist Rasputin), Brand's conviction serves as powerful punctuation for a culture that is becoming progressively more phobic, not just of the kind of libertine sexual attitudes as embodied by Brand, but of the prospect of mixed sex environments at all.

The 'paleo conservative' influencer Andrew Wilson has publicly stated:

"After Russel [sic] Brand getting ten years with so little evidence let me reiterate...do not do business with women...do not be friends with women...go to social events with a wing man and make sure you aren't alone with one...if dating take your time to really vet the woman."

Wilson's comment has attracted over 16,000 likes.

This marks the acceleration of a trend that has been gathering pace ever since the orchestrated 'MeToo' era, whereby women and men are to view each other with increasing hostility and suspicion, ultimately never beginning relationships or forming families at all.

It has long since been a goal of the ruling classes to restructure society so that people no longer live in family and extended family groups, but instead as isolated, atomised worker-drones who have no allegiance to any entity other than employer and state - and no other support network, either.

The first stage of this plan involved uncoupling sex from reproduction, which was successfully achieved with the advent of the pill and legalised abortion, and then separating it from committed relationships, which was accomplished via 'free love' and the promiscuous 'shagger' culture that Russell Brand became so renowned for promoting.

Decades of this destructive culture has led to the current generation of under-30s, Generation Z, becoming so horrified by the degenerate excesses of past generations they have witnessed, that they have forcefully pushed back, rejecting the promiscuous, hard-partying lifestyle of their older siblings and parents.

But far from reverting to more traditional approaches to relationships, they have simply abandoned the concept of physical intimacy altogether, with Generation Z being the most single and celibate in history.

Morality tales like Brand's will only further cement them in their views that interacting with the opposite sex is simply not worth the hassle, as rules around dating culture and consent are now so blurred and ambiguous that you never know what might come back to haunt you in 20 years time.

Predictive programming vehicles like the 1993 film Demolition Man (set 2032) tell us explicitly that sexual relationships are to be axed in the future, replaced with virtual reality alternatives - and there is already a huge market for the inevitable advent of the 'sex robot'.

In marketing this new form of "sex" to the populace, clever propagandists will point to cases like Brand's, and remind people that, when you have a sexual encounter with another person, there's no ultimate way of proving, to a foolproof legal standard, that it was consensual. It's always just your word against theirs, and if a jury believes them, your entire life can be snatched away from you in an instant, just as happened to Russell Brand. If it can happen to a top celebrity like him, who can afford the best lawyers, what hope would an ordinary person have against such a charge?

Isn't it therefore far safer and saner to consign sexual activity with another person to the annals of history, and swap instead to programmed bots, who can never make such ruinous allegations?

Not to mention all the dangerous diseases and unplanned pregnancies you're risking if you have a human encounter (in Demolition Man, pregnancy is illegal without a government licence).

Obviously, ending sex is a rather enormous social and psychological operation, which is why "they" needed such an enormous star to do it. Russell Brand was meticulously crafted into the megastar he became - very likely trained up from birth by MK Ultra style handlers - to have a profound and transformative effect on culture, and we certainly see that that is what he has had.

As the populace continues to argue ferociously over whether he's guilty or not guilty, and whether the sentence was fair, the common theme running through all these debates is that, if you are a man who has any kind of sexual encounter with a woman - or even, as Andrew Wilson stated, you are simply alone with one - there is always that possibility that, years later, she could throw a rape allegation at you and ruin your life.

Even if you conduct yourself impeccably at all times, there's no way of reliably immunising yourself against this possibility - except never being alone with women for any reason.

This is already something that is recommended to men in positions of power - that they should not ever see a female colleague or student alone in a closed room, always have someone else present or leave the door open, otherwise you never know what she might allege... (and the establishment might have particular cause to take seriously these allegations if you are, as Brand latterly presented himself as, a known state dissident: that's what we as "conspiracists" particularly are being nudged to fear).

Clearly, such a paranoid climate does not bode well for the future of male-female relationships, and that of course is the goal. Make men and women too paranoid and suspicious of each other to ever form meaningful relationships that might lead to marriage and family.

While other cultures that operate strict sex segregation, like Islamic countries, can still successfully propel their young towards marriage and reproduction because of a strong family and community culture that introduces men and women to each other in a chaperoned way, the West has long since lost that kind of social fabric.

Generation Z shows us that sowing hostility and distrust amongst the sexes in Western culture does not lead to a reversion to tradition - which would effectively be impossible, as the intertwined tapestries of stable families and communities such traditions are based on has almost completely unravelled - but to the isolated atomisation of the 'indoor human', which is the desired model for the citizen of the future: someone who lives alone, without partner or family, and exists primarily online, where it's 'safe'; where false allegations from a scorned ex can't ruin your life; or, for those on the other side of the divide, where predatory men can't assault you and get away with it.

Russell Brand has played his, likely scripted from birth, role in dramatically moving the culture closer to this point.

Because, just like he told us - as they always have to - in his 2014 book, which was part of his 'Trickster Tales' series:

He was the Pied Piper.

(If you enjoyed this article, you may also enjoy my previous article on Russell Brand and his “conviction”.)

Thanks for reading! This site is entirely reader-powered, with no paywalls, adverts, or wealthy corporate backers, making it truly independent. Your support is therefore crucial to ensuring this site's continued existence. If you'd like to make a contribution to help this site keep going, please consider...

1. Subscribing monthly via Patreon or Substack (where paid subscribers can comment on posts)

2. Making a one-off contribution via BuyMeACoffee

3. Contributing in either way via bank transfer to Nat West account number 30835984, sort code 54-10-27, account name FINCH MA (please use your email address as a reference if you'd like me to acknowledge receipt).

Your support is what allows this site to continue to exist and is enormously appreciated. Thank you.