I have a long-term social media friend, who fought heroically alongside me in the Twitter trenches of the 2020s, who I noticed I hadn't seen online for a while. Others noticed it too, and we wondered if she was okay.

A few days ago, I received this message from her (shared with permission):

"Hi Miri. I was wondering if you’d ever looked into long term contraceptive use and the impact that has on women later in life. I turned 40 this year and don’t know what’s wrong with me.

I worked in a fraud call centre for years. I didn’t particularly like it but it fitted round my children (especially my autistic son) and I found it challenging enough to make the day go fast and I prided myself on my exceptional people skills and ability to talk to extremely vulnerable people as well as following complicated systems and processes for the bank.

But in May a bit of stress at work with my manager caused (which in years past I would have brushed off) caused me such extreme stress and anxiety that I didn’t sleep at all for 2 nights and fell into depression. I have been signed off work ever since and fear I’ll never work again because my brain no longer works the way it did before. I have a great life really, amazing house, partner and kids and my parents nearby. My extended family have had a lot of crises going on which has added to my stress but I don’t know why I feel the way I do.

I keep seeing things about perimenopause and other women in droves leaving their jobs or suffering anxiety and losing themselves. A lot of my friends and family have mentioned hormones and sent me info about HRT but this does not seem a natural stage in life. I’m wondering if these synthetic hormones women take for years really can have such a profound affect on mental health. I do not want to take HRT. There are loads and loads of articles about this type of thing happening to women. What is going on?"

I wrote back to her straightaway to say I agreed that her current symptoms were highly likely to be related to long-term hormonal contraceptive use, as, indeed, was the very concept of 'perimenopause' itself, which only very recently seems to have been invented (more on that later). I recommended to her the GAPS diet, which is specifically formulated to help the body heal from the onslaught of modern toxins, including the contraceptive pill.

The GAPS book also details the connection between mothers who take the pill, and later have children with autism, pertinent as my friend mentioned having an autistic child, and in later messages, mentioned that friends of hers with autistic children also seemed to be suffering badly with the 'perimenopause'. She wrote:

"Just as a side subject myself and 3 other women I know have recently had breakdowns in some sense (my friend who is a teacher is on the verge of one) interestingly we all have a child with an autism or adhd diagnosis and this seems to be a big risk factor."

There's no doubt that these issues - ADHD, autism, perimenopause - are all connected, as is their sudden ubiquity in popular discourse, when, prior to the fairly recent past, almost nobody had heard of them. Prior to the 1980s, medical students were not taught about autism at all, because the condition was so vanishingly rare.

Similarly, the concept of perimenopause has quite suddenly and vigorously come to the forefront of the national conversation, as it increasingly dominating women's spaces, with high-profile celebrities such as Davina McCall and Penelope Cruz talking in detail about the (terrifying, horrifying, awful) effects it has had on their lives.

Indeed, when I did a news search for the term 'perimenopause', the very first article that came up (from The Guardian) was entitled:

'Perimenopause is everywhere. How do you know if you're in it?'

So I'm definitely not imagining a sudden explosion in coverage of this topic, which would seem curious if it is (as it's billed as being) a "natural, normal life stage that has always been with us".

If that is so, then why did nobody think to talk about it until roughly 2019? (A web search confirms that: "Widespread, heavy press and media coverage of perimenopause began a notable upward climb around 2015, followed by an unprecedented, explosive surge in 2021 and 2022.")

Although perimenopause is described as a natural transitional stage, characterised by a woman's hormones gradually declining in order to prepare the body for menopause, the perimenopause is also said to be capable of causing "severe mental health symptoms, including sudden anxiety, panic attacks, clinical depression, severe irritability, brain fog, and feelings of emotional overwhelm or a "mental breakdown".

Just as my Twitter friend detailed.

Well, excuse my scepticism, but I'm not wholly convinced that a "natural, normal stage of life that has always been with us" would cause such devastating symptoms, because I simply do not believe the human body would "naturally" be so badly designed.

Just as I don't believe autism is "genetic".

And I don't believe people who suddenly drop dead in their thirties and forties died of "natural causes".

So, like autism and died suddenlys, I believe the epidemic of poor health in mid-life women that is now being labelled 'perimenopause' has, in fact, been intentionally engineered and manufactured, by the very same people who gave us epidemic autism and sudden death, and for the very same reasons.

The difference is, I don't believe perimenopause has been primarily manufactured via vaccine. I believe it has been created by long-term use of hormonal contraception, and that this effect was intentional: built into the design.

I suggest that the pill always had two purposes: one, to dramatically reduce the birth rate whilst women are in their most fertile years, and two, to neutralise the economic power and potential of women in their forties, just as they may be returning to full-time work after childcare duties have concluded, and when they should still have decades of prime working life left.

The fact that perimenopause is being mainstreamed and normalised by big celebrities and high-profile publications in just the same way autism has been in the past gives us a very big clue that this is a marketing campaign to whitewash the real cause of the condition: toxic pharmaceuticals "routinely" taken by millions.

Huge, coordinated PR campaigns told us autism was "genetic"; now they're telling us perimenopause is "hormonal", and in each case, there is no emphasis at all put on how powerful modern toxins might have interacted with theses "genes" and "hormones" to give us the growing catastrophe of millions of severely impaired people.

Genes and hormones may play a role in these conditions, insofar as influencing how somebody's body responds to poison (some people can metabolise it better than others), but millions of pounds poured into autism research has failed to find an "autism gene", just as they will fail to find a "perimenopause gene" if they look.

Due to the ubiquity of transgenderism in the modern world, we are all well aware of the havoc wreaked on the body by taking synthetic hormones. Men who load up on synthetic oestrogen and women who mainline testosterone put themselves at risk of all sorts of future health problems.

However, these health problems do not simply occur because these people are taking cross-sex hormones, but because they are taking synthetic hormones in an unnatural way and throwing their own bodily harmony out of balance. Similar risks are seen in biological men who take testosterone.

Women who take the pill and other hormonal contraceptives are therefore doing the same thing - taking unnatural hormones and putting themselves at risk - and some of them have been doing so for decades.

Whatever 'the science' says (given that most science says whatever its funders instruct it to say, and even editors of respected medical journals admit at least half of it isn't true), common sense dictates that intentionally skewering your own delicate hormonal balance for years or decades with a synthetic petrochemical is likely to have far-reaching consequences.

When I looked up whether the pill was safe to use long-term, I was advised:

"Long-term side effects of birth control pills may include a higher risk of blood clots and some cancers. However, hormonal methods of birth control are safe for most people, as long as they have a doctor’s approval."

Very reassuring. Whilst I'm there, I'll be sure to ask for my doctor's approval for my 8th covid booster, annual flu jab, and lifelong course of statins, too.

In analysing what the dark truth of the pill and its role in population control and eugenics might really be, it's important to look at the forces who bankrolled the pill's creation and unleashed it on society in the first place.

As I wrote in a 2022 article:

"Intensive and heavily elite-bankrolled research for a “magic pill” to prevent pregnancy had been underway since 1950. This research was driven by Margaret Sanger, the founder of America’s most successful and ubiquitous birth control clinics, Planned Parenthood.

While she is often celebrated as a champion of women’s rights and reproductive freedoms, the truth about Margaret Sanger is rather more unsavoury. Sanger was in fact an ardently racist eugenicist with ties to the Ku Klux Klan[1] whose motivations for proponing birth control had little to do with liberating women, and very much more to do with ‘cleansing society’. She stated in 1921 that:  “birth control must lead ultimately to a cleaner race." [2]

To further clarify Sanger’s feelings on reproduction and birth, consider this paragraph from her 1922 book, The Pivot of Civilisation:

“Our failure to segregate morons who are increasing and multiplying ... demonstrates our foolhardy and extravagant sentimentalism ... [Philanthropists] encourage the healthier and more normal sections of the world to shoulder the burden of unthinking and indiscriminate fecundity of others; which brings with it, as I think the reader must agree, a dead weight of human waste. Instead of decreasing and aiming to eliminate the stocks that are most detrimental to the future of the race and the world, it tends to render them to a menacing degree dominant ... We are paying for, and even submitting to, the dictates of an ever-increasing, unceasingly spawning class of human beings who never should have been born at all." [3]

Margaret Sanger also began publishing her own newspaper where she argued in favour of birth control and abortion. In 1915, she was charged with publishing an "obscene and lewd article", and so fled to Britain. It was here in London that she met the young Marie Stopes, at a meeting at the Fabian Society Hall in London in mid-July 1915. [4]

It is worth noting that The Fabian Society is not without controversy and the place of this meeting not incidental. The name “Fabian” comes symbolically from the man who in Rome was named Fabius Cunctator, the Delayer, who used to advocate  “a slow and progressive tactic”, instead of direct attack. [5]

The aims of the Fabian Society were developed by prominent early member, Sidney Webb. He derived them from the teachings of Englishman John Ruskin (1819-1900) at Oxford University. Ruskin advocated a utopian society, and espoused theories developed from the teachings of great philosopher, Plato (428-347 BC). In his work, The Republic, Plato outlined his ideal society, which was an aristocratic society ruled by the elite. It included the elimination of marriage and the family, and introduced selective breeding by the government that would destroy all inferior offspring. [6]"

So it is not a 'conspiracy theory', and is in fact entirely evidence-based fact, that the pill was part of a elite eugenic plot to destroy people and institutions in order to maximise ruling class control.

It seems reasonable to conclude from this that, even if there had been a way to make the pill 'safe' for long-term use, it is unlikely these insidious depopulationists would have pursued it, and it is far more logical to assume that inducing chronic illness in users was built into the design.

Then, to obscure the damage this toxic chemical has done, a new life stage has been invented - 'perimenopause' - just as an increasing array of new childhood developmental stages were invented to disguise vaccine injury.

And, just as the existence of unvaccinated children with autism doesn't disprove the statement that vaccines cause autism (GAPS, as referenced earlier, talks about this), nor does the existence of significant perimenopause symptoms in women who have never taken the pill disprove the statement that the pill causes it, for this reason: everyone is on the pill now. It's in the water supply, so it's not a question of whether any individual woman has been exposed to the pill's synthetic hormones - all women have - it's simply a question of dose.

However, the anecdotal research I have conducted so far confirms that women with little or no past history of hormonal contraception use do not seem to be seeing the same devastating 'perimenopausal' symptoms as those who have made heavy use of these products.

Considering the huge tectonic shifts that are currently taking place in the working world, as AI gallops ahead and more and more people are put out of work, there is also quite a logical and practical case to be made for why the ruling classes would be motivated to maim and disable millions of working-age adults to the extent they can no longer continue with their jobs.

We have explored at this site many times the ruling class goal of removing the ability from many to be independent through work, forcing them instead to be sustained by a government stipend, and there has been an increasing focus in recent months on the concept of a 'Universal Basic Income', with heavyweight cultural figures like Elon Musk suggesting it is going to be a necessity in the near future.

This requirement will become even more acute if an increasing number of homes are dealing with a resident with long-term chronic illness, who not only cannot work, but requires costly additional therapies as well.

A healthy, robust population in a strong economy with access to fairly remunerated work would likely reject UBI, seeing it as the tool of suppression and control it is, yet a struggling, ill, unemployed population would rejoice at its inception, seeing it as a desperately needed lifeline.

So the conditions have been created to manoeuvre as many people as possible into the latter camp.

Problem-reaction-solution, as always.

A sceptic may read my account, roll their eyes, and say, "oh come on, the pill's been around since the '60s, they don't plan things that far in advance".

When the reality is that we have been taught to plan in days, weeks, and months, whilst the ruling classes plan in years, decades, and centuries.

I believe we have been living through a century-old business plan, which began being implemented in the years following World War II, and we are now approaching its apex and grand finale.

If nothing else, I am quite certain that the next three years are going to be very, very interesting - and there may well be significant danger ahead - but it's important to remember that, in some ancient languages, the symbol for 'danger' is the same as the symbol for 'opportunity'.

Thanks for reading! This site is entirely reader-powered, with no paywalls, adverts, or wealthy corporate backers, making it truly independent. Your support is therefore crucial to ensuring this site's continued existence. If you'd like to make a contribution to help this site keep going, please consider...

1. Subscribing monthly via Patreon or Substack (where paid subscribers can comment on posts)

2. Making a one-off contribution via BuyMeACoffee

3. Contributing in either way via bank transfer to Nat West account number 30835984, sort code 54-10-27, account name FINCH MA (please use your email address as a reference if you'd like me to acknowledge receipt).

Your support is what allows this site to continue to exist and is enormously appreciated. Thank you.