"We don't catch diseases. We build them." - Antoine Bechamp
Every time I opine on the subject of the pretend pandemic - that it was all staged, that the tests are fake, the numbers fudged - without fail, I always get the refrain from a number of individuals that, "I agree the threat was exaggerated and the restrictions were nonsense, but there was definitely a virus. I was really ill."
So we need to examine these claims in a little more detail, because if you're aware of the fraudulent nature of the tests, the figures, and the vaccine, but haven't yet seen the epic fraud and fabrication behind the idea of "the virus" (and, indeed, viruses in general), you are missing a crucial part of the picture. Perhaps the most important part, in fact, because if you continue to believe "there was a virus" and that it was responsible for people's poor health, then you are, ultimately, vulnerable to falling for these kinds of hoaxes again.
So, I'm going to make a number of rather bold claims here, and then I'm going to back them up.
These claims are all true and relatively easy to prove, but the reason people react so forcefully against them is not because they have strong, credible, reproducible evidence to the contrary (they don't, as there isn't any), but because the idea that viruses cause disease is such a core foundational principle of modern society and something we are inculcated with practically from birth, given one of the very first things new parents are told to do is vaccinate their baby to protect them against viruses.
Please note that the immune system of an infant is typically too immature to mount the antibody response vaccines are designed to produce, and, traditionally, infants were not vaccinated until past the age of two for this reason. The reason they are injected from birth now is to, vaccine tsars admit, "train the parents" - e.g., if your baby survived perfectly well until the age of two with no vaccines, you might quite correctly come to the conclusion that they are fine without them. Can't have that, so the injecting regimen starts straightaway, to hoodwink parents into the belief that their child has only survived infancy because of all the injections.
This propaganda - that viruses are dangerous and we need protection from them - is then repeated all throughout our childhood, when we are told to avoid ill friends in case we "catch" something from them, instructed to stay at home when unwell so we don't "spread our germs" etc., and then further indoctrinated into us at school, not only via Biology and History lessons where we are taught to worship Edward Jenner, but through the vaccination that also now happens on school premises.
Schools are not clinical environments and therefore are totally unsuitable premises for the application of powerful medical interventions, but they carry out vaccination regardless: ritualistically and as part of the compelling behavioural and thought modification programme - convincing us that we only manage to survive to adulthood because of all the injections.
Needless to say, if you are propagandised from literally the day you are born until you are an adult with the idea that viruses are contagious and cause disease, you are going to believe it. I did too. Yet I can assure you it isn't true, and, like much of what is taught in government schools (including medical schools), is devious propaganda devised by the ruling classes to keep the plebs in their place.
Fear of contagious viruses is such an epic weapon for the ruling classes that it's really one of their greatest and most evil masterstrokes, enabling them, as it does, to do everything from sterilising the young (see HPV vaccines) to euthanising the old (see 'flu jabs), as well foisting anti-human tyranny on the populace any time they please, simply by triggering the fear in the populace that they have created regarding "deadly viruses". Remember that one interpretation of the word FEAR is False Evidence Appearing Real.
So, in dismantling the "deadly viruses" hoax (and it is a hoax), first we have to look at how conventional disease-model theory characterises viruses. They are depicted almost as cartoon villains, microscopic mercenaries that can leap through the air from person to person, storm though your body's myriad of complex defences, and then start to do dastardly thing inside you that cause dreadful disease.
Yet, a virus is not a living being like, for instance, a parasite is. A parasite can indeed be transferred to you by an infected person, and then cause all manner of nasty symptoms, because parasites are alive and therefore have the ability to take on nutrition - energy - thereby giving them the ability to wreak havoc on their hosts. Hence, key in getting rid of a parasite is to starve it (parasites, like most disease-causing entities, including cancer, love sugar).
A virus, however, has no ability to take on any nutrition. It cannot respire. It has no brain or nervous system. It's not "alive" by any kind of reasonable definition of what that means, and that being the case, can any viral contagion advocate please explain how a non-living entity which cannot absorb energy to fuel it, is nevertheless able to fly huge distances, defeat the powerfully protective membranes on our skin, in our eyes, in our noses and mouths, in our digestive system, and then STILL have the energy (which it didn't have in the first place) to start causing severe symptoms of disease?
No wonder they have to start propagandising us with this stuff when we're five, otherwise no-one would ever believe it.
Something that is not alive and has no energy supply cannot behave in the way "viral contagion" theory says that viruses do. I have written before that the whole area of vaccinology is essentially a scam, based on long-outdated pseudo-science and quackery - and so too is the field of conventional virology. It's science fiction, not evidence-based fact. Nobody has been able to prove - ever - that viruses fly through the air, insert themselves into people, and begin causing disease.
All that anyone has been able to prove is that when people are ill, they test positive for certain viruses. If the test is reliable (and that's a big "if" - it certainly isn't if it's the PCR), then all that proves is that a virus is present in someone's body at the same time that they are ill. It doesn't prove the virus is responsible for the disease, nor that they caught the virus from another person.
So, back to the people who say "there was definitely a virus. I was really ill."
That you were ill doesn't prove there was a virus. It only proves that you were ill. Even if you tested positive on the Covid test - and even if that test were reliable (which it isn't) - that doesn't prove a virus is responsible for your symptoms. It just shows that it is present whilst you are ill. It's kind of like saying, "a load of rubbish was dumped in my backyard, and then rats appeared. Clearly, therefore, rats are the cause of rubbish in backyards."
The main reason people seem to struggle with this - with the idea that there is no Covid and that viruses in general don't cause disease - is that they are adamant that the illness they experienced in 2020 was "different to any I have ever had before".
Look: I am not trying to demean anyone's experience when I say this, but, seriously - I hear this EVERY year. Every year, without fail, people say they've been really ill and that they've never been so ill before in their lives. In some cases, of course, they'll be right - at some point, we are iller than we've ever been - but often, people forget just how poorly "normal" illnesses can make you feel, "Just" a cold can have you flat out in bed for days, feeling absolutely awful and not up to the most basic everyday tasks. We say colds are non-serious, not because they don't make you feel seriously unwell, but because they don't last long and have no serious side effects.
'Flu, meanwhile, is certainly not trivial and can make you feel like you're on death's door - and it can and does cause hospital admissions, especially for those with comorbidities. So to say, "this was no normal cold or flu because I felt really ill" is a misnomer. Normal colds, and especially 'flus, can make you feel really ill.
It is, however, theoretically possible that you experienced something different in 2020, because it is theoretically possible the ruling classes manipulated the environment in some way to increase symptoms of ill health, such as by cranking up the EMF (when we went to a heavily-saturated 5G area, my husband promptly got a very severe nosebleed, the first and last he has ever had in all the time I've known him), or putting more poisons than usual in the tap water, as they did in the famous Camelford aluminium poisoning scandal.
It's possible they did this. But - and this is the key point, so please forgive me if I repeat it a few times - it's not possible they released a virus that caused ill health, because that is not something viruses are capable of doing.
If, as the establishment-backed conspiracy theory goes, "Covid was produced in a lab and released", do you know what would happen? Nothing. If a virus was engineered in a lab and sprayed around the place, it would fall on the floor and do nothing and that would be the end of that story.
So, no virus was causing anybody to have any ill health, and personally, I doubt even that there was a coordinated or nationwide attempt to increase illness via other means, because it simply wasn't necessary. The TV created all the fear, hysteria and compliance that was required, in completely healthy people. They did not need to be made ill to believe in the pandemic and to comply with the tyranny.
However, I will repeat this yet again because it is so true - the power of the mind is exceptionally strong. If you believe there's a dangerous virus out there and that it's possible for you to "catch it", you are far more likely to develop symptoms of this alleged virus, than people who do not believe the virus exists.
We all know how tricky the mind can be in this department, e.g., if you Google "headache", within five minutes, you will have convinced yourself that your benign headache from dehydration, is actually a brain tumour, because you definitely have all the other symptoms of a brain tumour... It simply is the truth that when we have certain beliefs about our health, our bodies start to manifest those symptoms. If you believed Covid existed - even if you saw through other parts of the pandemic - that you were simply more likely to develop symptoms we were told indicated Covid.
What's also crucial to note is that there is no evidence there was any more serious illness in 2020 than in any other year. When I say "there's no Covid", it is repeatedly misinterpreted as me saying "there is no serious illness and death". Of course there is and of course there always has been - millions of people were ill in 2020, some of them seriously, just like every other year. Tens of thousands died, just like every other year. But, when you take the drug and ventilator induced institutional deaths out of the equation (e.g., care homes and hospitals murdering patients who, given the proper treatments, would have got better), you can see illness / death rates in 2020 were in no way exceptional or unusual.
To be clear, there were no more patients with serious respiratory illnesses in 2020 than in any previous year, it's just in previous years, these patients were diagnosed with 'flu and pneumonia and in 2020, they were diagnosed with Covid. So sure, you might have been ill in 2020 - even very ill. But there's no evidence you were any more likely to be ill in 2020, than in 2019, 2018, or 2017.
Furthermore - and this is a crucial point the establishment was desperate to suppress at the height of the fake plague, being very heavy-handed with those who exposed it - the hospitals were emptier than they have ever been in recorded history. If there were all these people being struck down by a mystery, severe new illness, where were they? Why weren't the hospitals "overwhelmed", as we were told they would be? Why weren't the emergency Nightingale overflows ever even used?
It's because the vast majority of people who were ill, just had ordinary seasonal illnesses and were not ill enough to go to hospital - just like every other year. That's why, and it's an incontrovertible fact, because if there was a serious new illness, the hospitals would have been full to bursting. They weren't.
In addition: remember all the "hypocritical" ministers breaking all the rules, having parties and affairs etc? Please ask yourself if these famously self-serving politicians would have done this had they believed there was any risk whatsoever of their catching "a dangerous virus".
Boris Johnson himself partied with the best of them, despite supposedly being "a Covid survivor" with a vulnerable new baby at home! Do you think he would put himself and his family at serious risk by going to "super-spreader" events like parties if there was actually a virus he could catch and spread? Of course not. He never had "Covid", that was yet more poorly acted political theatre. Boris and co all knew there was zero risk to their health by partying and philandering, because they knew there was no virus. Nothing was "spreading". Nothing had been "released from a lab". That was all just baseless propaganda to scare people into compliance, because, were it true, the ministers would have been cowering in hazmat suits inside their mansions, spraying sanitiser on the postman - not out partying.
These MPs were pilloried in the press and by the public for being "hypocrites", but they were not hypocrites - they were liars. They propagandised the public with fear-based behavioural modification techniques, into believing in a deadly threat that they knew themselves didn't exist.
And that's because that's all the elite needed. Fear. They didn't need an actual virus, because they knew simply telling people there was one would be enough: that is how human psychology works and that is the precise message of the fable, The Emperor's New Clothes. Crazy conspiraquacks like myself are the equivalent of the impudent little boy jumping up and down on the side-lines shouting, "but the Emperor is naked!" If you look at what's actually there, rather than what the state tells you to see, it's obvious he is. All the real evidence shows he is. But you're not allowed to say it.
I know it's very difficult to wrap one's head around, the idea that the ruling classes would deceive us on such a colossal scale, leaving many a baffled person to ask, but WHY, I don't get WHY they would do this.
In answering this question, one has to understand that our ruling classes have pathological God complexes and believe they can bend reality to their will by overriding objective reality with their mirages, illusions, and lies. If I said to a member of the ruling elite, "viruses don't cause diseases", they would reply, "true, but because now the whole world believes that they do and behaves as if they do, that is now reality. We created that reality through the very power of our own will".
You can think of the ruling elites as being like the character "Christoff" from the film The Truman Show - ruthless control-freaks who believe they have the power and the right to create entire fabricated worlds around people, to relentlessly lie to them and go to extraordinary lengths to obscure the truth - because when you can persuade people to invest so deeply in a lie, you have complete control over them. "Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." - Voltaire. Would anyone have imposed any part of the Covid tyranny, including administering and receiving lethal injections, if they didn't believe in "deadly viruses"? Obviously not, so this is the power the ruling classes now wield by having spun this centuries-old hoax.
If you think about virus theory in quite basic terms, you can start to see it really doesn't stand up to any scrutiny, because, there are 7 billion people in this world, many of them highly mobile, containing all sorts of viruses (it is estimated the average person contains at least five). So why isn't everyone constantly ill? Why aren't we constantly being infected an re-infected every time we interact with others? Why is the average person only ill once or twice a year, even people who have very mobile and people-centric lives, such as those who work in pubs and come into contact with hundreds of potentially "disease-carrying strangers" every week? More to the point, why don't nurses and doctors constantly have viral-based illness, given they are constantly around unwell people who have them?
It's because you do not catch diseases. As Antoine Bechamp told us, you build them.
You get ill when the toxicity in your body (from toxins in food and drink, in the air, from EMFs, from emotional stress, etc.) hits a critical point and your body needs to get it out. That's what a cold or a 'flu is. An all-body detox expunging all the toxins (through coughing, sneezing, fevers, etc.). Your cells produce viruses at this point to help with the detox and internal cleaning. You can think of viruses as a kind of soap, and the terrible irony is, they are not dangerous, malevolent enemies trying to thwart your good health - just the opposite. They're trying to help, because (and the entire pharmaceutical industry is absolutely terrified of the day people realise this ineffable fact) your body is not actually trying to kill you. Rather, every cell in your body is dedicated to keeping you alive, and your body has a wide range of masterful abilities exclusively devoted to protecting and preserving you.
People often get ill around the same time because a) people who live or work together are exposed to a lot of the same toxins, and b) our bodies synch and communicate - see menstrual synchronising - and one body having a detox can send powerful signals to nearby bodies that, hey, this environment is a bit toxic, you could do with a detox, too.
That doesn't mean anyone "caught" anything from anyone else (I ask again: why aren't doctors and nurses constantly ill? After all, they're constantly around ill people, and unless they work in full hazmat suits, cannot avoid close contact).
If viral theory and contagion models were even remotely true, then basically everyone, apart from hermits, would be ill constantly, including and especially people who have a lot of contact with others. And yet, there is no scholarly evidence to show that someone who works in a pub - encountering hundreds of new people a week - is any more likely to get ill than someone who works in an office - seeing the same small selection of people every day. If viral theory was true, not only would public-facing jobs be too dangerous to do and too impossible to retain employees for (because they would constantly be going off sick), the human race actually wouldn't exist, having been wiped out by viral contagions aeons ago. In effect, if viral theory were true, there would be no-one alive to believe it.
Let's be clear, there are various poisons in the environment and our world is more toxic than it has ever been. So, of course people get ill. If you poison a living organism enough times, even with low dose poison, it eventually gets ill. But that fact does not mean there is, was, or ever could be a viral epidemic. It's not a thing that can happen, and the reason the establishment has invested so much money in "plague" movies over recent decades (Contagion, Outbreak, World War Z, etc.) is to manicure people's minds into believing in it. But the idea of a contagious viral plague is just as fictional as any of the aforementioned movies, and the establishment tells you this quite explicitly.
When I watched Contagion in 2019, about a year before Covid made its debut, I immediately knew what they were telling us and made a post predicting a fake plague, staged to coerce people into taking a dangerous vaccine. Not only did the directors of Contagion tell us this was coming (in the DVD extras, they state "Contagion is not a work of fiction, this is going to happen for real, it's a matter of when not if"), but Matt Hancock himself confirmed the UK based its pandemic response on the film.
The fake plague scriptwriters then gave the first vaccine to "William Shakespeare", who's most famous quote is "all the world's a stage" - and in reporting this dark little joke, Matt Hancock literally could not keep a straight face.
So, there you have it. The producers and directors behind "Covid! The Plague Blockbuster" have told you quite clearly and from the start that it's not real, it's staged and scripted and akin to a movie - and so I am simply reiterating their revelation (because they always do tell us what they're doing, a phenomenon known as 'revelation of the method', if you simply learn how to interpret what they say. For instance, they state the vaccine is "safe and effective". But they don't say for whom and in what way. Is it 'safe' because they're immunised against law suits, and 'effective' because it does exactly what they intended it to do?)
It's vitally important in reclaiming our true power from these dark and evil wizards (note: Hollywood is named after the wood from the Holly tree, traditionally used by wizards to make wands) that we see through their illusions and don't invest in any way in their spell-casting and black magic.
The idea of "deadly contagious viruses" is a hoax. Nobody has ever been able to prove viruses are directly transmissible nor that they are the culprits for symptoms of disease, and they never will be able to prove this, because it isn't true.
This is a relatively short primer on this subject, and there's a cornucopia of amazing further information out there, such as the book Virus Mania and the docu-series, The Viral Delusion (because I know people will respond to this commentary with "but what about Ebola? What about Polio?" - you will find all the answers you seek in these, and many other, materials).
In closing, I just want to repeat what Antoine Bechamp told us, hundreds of years ago, about the true nature of disease - because essentially, that could have substituted the whole essay - "we don't catch diseases. We build them."
Thanks for reading! This site is 100% reader funded, with no advertisements or paywalls. If you would like to make a contribution, please do so through Patreon, BuyMeACoffee or bank transfer to: Nat West, a/c 30835984, s/c 54-10-27, account name FINCH MA. Your support is really appreciated. Thank you.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Here's an excerpt from 'Virus Mania' by Torsten Engelbretch and Claus Kohnlein *written in 2007*
I personally think, the 'step' below to 'ignore alternative toxic causes' is particularly telling...
"Corruption of research is a widespread phenomenon currently found in many major, supposedly contagious health problems, ranging from AIDS, to Hepititus C, Bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE, or 'mad cow' disease), SARS, Avian flu and current vaccination practices (human papillomavirus or HPV vaccination).
In research of all these six distinct public health concerns, scientific research on viruses (or prions in the case of BSE) slipped into the wrong track following the same systematic pathway. This pathway always includes several key steps:
Inventing the risk of a disastrous epidemic;
Incriminating an elusive pathogen;
Ignoring alternative toxic causes;
Manipulating epidemiology with non-verifiable numbers to maximise the false perception of an imminent catastrophe;
Promising salvation with vaccines.
This guarantees large financial returns. But how is it possible to achieve all this? Simply by relying on the most powerful activator of human decision making process - FEAR!"
Sound familiar?
Thanks. A very good article that hopefully engages people to ask questions and think. One question I asked myself is "how does a virus (no brain, not living etc) know the months of the year?" We've all heard the expression "the flu season" but how does a virus know that summer is about to end and winter is starting? In both hemispheres the flu season corresponds to reduced sunlight/going outside so perhaps the cause of "flu" has something to do with the time of year? So could cold/flu symptoms be a result of the reduced Vit D our bodies naturally receive? Read an Italian study on the early covid deaths in that country that demonstrated that 95% of early covid deaths were Vit D deficient. Plenty of studies demonstrate low Vit D levels = lower immunity to infection. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21527855/
But hey you can't patent Vit D!!
While I think there are a lot of good points in your article, namely about our basic good health is the most important factor in whether or not we get ill. And that a lot of vaccines that are in use are not proven to work and are possibly dangerous ie. flu shots. I didn't know until recently that the research is conducted by the pharmaceutical companies themselves and isn't checked properly by the regulators, so they can basically print anything they want and get away with it. I think the 'terrain theory' has a lot of merits, we become sick with infections when we are under stress or in winter when our immune systems are weakened because of being inside and not having enough access to sunlight, bad diets, chemicals, lack of sleep, too much screen time, not enough social interactions and many more things. I think a prime example of the terrain theory in action is the Spanish flu. It struck after 4 years of World war when all populations were on their knees. What I disagree with you about is that the Spanish flu was a virus. After the last 2 plus years, I have seen how easily people are manipulated into believing anything they are told and well-meaning professionals can be fooled just as easily as anyone into believing nonscience and doing wicked things. But there are good people who stand up and speak out, even when they know they will be attacked. So, all the people studying viruses for the past century, many, in fact, most could be wrong but some of them would have spoken up. When I listen to Dr. Robert Malone, I believe him when he says he has spent his life studying viruses and they are real.
Another factor is a human aversion to contagion, It is inbred in us for a reason. We avoid, actually recoil from ill people as a form of protection that is instinctual. That is because bacteria and viruses are a threat to us and we catch them from each other, exactly the same way animals do. That isn't really open to debate in my mind, and colds and flu are viruses.
I did catch it myself last Christmas and I was feeling low and stressed and I think that's why I got it. But I had flu about 20 yrs ago and I was much sicker with the flu but this was different. It was different from anything I have had before, the complete loss of taste and smell and exhaustion was new. I am aware of the being propagandized, and I noticed as soon as they started in 2020. That doesn't mean you should disregard your own experience, so I won't.
What I do appreciate about your article is being challenged to look at different aspects, if there were more challenges and open but respectful debate things would be much better. Thank you for your work, It is always engaging.
I am intrigued as to the PROCESS by which a person with ZERO biomedical education, knowledge, training or experience arives at conclusions concerning virii that are the exact opposite of hundreds of thousands of people with decades of education, knowledge, training AND experience in medical science and medical practice.
Have all of those medical scientists been brain-washed?
Did the vanishingly miniscule number of people touting "Terrain Therory" have some sort of magical medical epiphany?
Of ALL the people I would call Covid Heroes (ie. QUALIFIED Medical professionals who saw the covidSCAM as an engineered fraud right from the start), I see NONE who reject Germ Theory and fully accept Terrain Theory.
Greg Spinolae: You don't need a "biomedical education" to ask the question why is there no independent variable? Why is there no laboratory anywhere in the world that can produce actual material samples of isolated, purified "virus molecules" for independent analysis? Over 200 FOIs to governments, health institutions and laboratories in 40 countries and not one of them can provide a sample. Not one!
Greg - you could (and people often do) say the exact same thing about vaccines. “All qualified medical professionals agree they’re wonderful, only quacks reject them, blah blah”.
You have had a knee jerk emotional reaction to my piece not based on facts. Actually, there are many top experts who agree viral contagion is a fantasy, as per the two resources I linked.
The process by which I arrived at my conclusions is outlined in the piece, very clearly. That is the point of the piece. You haven’t engaged with any of the points I made at all, nor constructed a meaningful argument against them. All you’ve said is essentially “how dare you question the experts”.
I am surprised that a person such as yourself who usually encourages independent thought, challenging “the experts” and mainstream dogmas. Is now saying the exact opposite.
“Trust the experts” is a non-argument. Explain WHY and HOW what I’ve said in my piece is wrong, and we might have the basis for a conversation.
I agree with most of your observations Miri and think if we left the immune system alone it would deal with whatever comes its way.The issue for me is how does one explain the lifelong research of people like Dr.Judy Mikovich who did alot of research into retroviruses and was ejected from her job and imprisioned because people like Fauci didn't like what she discovered. I find it hard to dismiss her work after reading her books.Do you believe she is a fraud?
Hi Terry, thanks for the comment. I haven’t studied Mikovich closely enough to come to any conclusions about her, but please see comment from James above. Mikovich may well be a fine scientist, but what James says is still true. I think plenty of good and decent people can be hoodwinked by dogma and elaborate “tricks”, cf many good researchers believe vaccines are good and necessary, just need to be “tweaked” to made safe. I think you and I would agree that this is not true. That doesn’t make the scientists who think it is liars or frauds, it just means they have got something wrong. I don’t know if you’ve read the book or seen the series I linked, but they are definitely worth checking out.
If you understand rituals then you will understand what happened, the first time COVID was mentioned was on the anniversary of the death of Crowley who is connected to the religion thelema "do what thou wilt be the whole of the law" and you explain the will perfectly in this
My personal experience of whatever 'covid' was, is that it felt like some kind of poisoning. I was very ill (as was my husband and daughter) in the height of summer - July 2021 - and we were floored ... we manage holiday changeovers so we know that for the past 10+ years neither of us has ever not been able to work during the peak or off-peak season due to illness - this time, we were both not able to work for 3 weekends in a row, totally unheard of and it didn't feel like flu, we literally couldn't move, had low oxygen levels and felt poisoned! Caroline Coram on Twitter suggests that arsene gas (via invisible chem-trails) is possibly one cause of covid symptoms. I totally understand the whole no virus argument, but there was definitely something that created toxicity for us and it was either from vaccine shedding (friends had stayed just before), some energetic upgrade going on (was during the lions gate portal) or arsene gas or similar toxicity through the environment ... but it wasn't imagined or 'flu' for sure... I also believe that quantum theory means that sharing energetic space with someone who has certain 'covid' frequency could easily mean you resonate with that frequency and get the same symptoms...
If you listen to Dr Lee Merrit and others she says that it is very likely that something (toxins) was released and distributed- so a bioweapon. She was mapping where the so called Covid outbreaks were and looking at what was going on in those places. A colleague mapped people falling ill (supposedly with the Covid) at one stage and there was a pattern. It was following a certain highway of their State- hence something being sprayed perhaps. And whatever was released it is thought to react with EMR (just like what is in the jabs). Make of it what you will but non of this would surprise me. I became ill with the symptoms of this suspicious lurgy just over a year ago. In terms of severity it was no more than a mild flu that went on for 3 weeks. I most certainly didn't do a test. But I had some different and strange symptoms that I haven't had before. Now I lead a very healthy lifestyle and eat well so I certainly wasn't toxic so to speak. I only ever use natural therapies. I would say that how it felt was as though I had been poisoned and I felt very toxic. Yes I had a cough and headache etc but it was this feeling of poisoned that really stood out. Then after I was over it my liver was swollen and I had to have treatment for it (natural). My practitioner (who happens to be in an Asian Country) said they were seeing a lot of liver problems post the Covid. So this all fits with something sinister having been released for sure. You do not get poisoning nor a swollen liver from a respiratory illness. And given it was likely a poisoning then there has been nothing to catch from another person. So all this nonsense of keeping apart, masks, PPE in medical settings- a waste of time and nothing more other than something nefarious behind it all.
One potential cause of 'covid' like illnesses and cancers over the last 3 years and possibly much longer is accumulated arsenic poisoning that is worsened by weather-mod. Anyone with any faith in their own eyes knows that there must be a reason for the trails in the skies these last 3 years - at the very least. THIS WOULD BE A POISONING NOT A VIRUS. Please look into Arsine gas aerosol spraying and how it might be activated by lightning and the radiation that comes with it. We all need to step out of our bubbles from time to time, if only to provide opportunity to other theories and their critics. We know there is widespread psychopathy at a high level in our corporate world and the military/industrial complex. Can you not consider poisoning could be happening in this way?
An excellent article. As well as 'Virus Mania', I would recommend reading 'Fear of the Invisible' by Janine Roberts and 'What Really Makes You Ill' by Dawn Lester and David Parker. Lanka predicted what would happen in a video he produced in 2009 called 'Pandemie Theater'. The first part is still on Youtube amazingly, although his prediction can be found in the second part and I don't think that part is up any longer.
Covid Crusher: Mix one heaped teaspoon of salt in a mug of clean warm or cold water. Cup a hand and sniff or snort the mugful up your nose in stages, spitting out anything which comes down into your mouth. If you have a burning sensation, then you have a virus, so wait until the burning sensation goes away (2-3 minutes) then blow out your nose with toilet paper and flush away, washing your hands afterwards. Continue to do my free salt water cure Morning, Noon, Night, or more often if you want, until the soreness goes away and you feel as if you are flushing with plain water. Job done. I have been doing this simple cure for viruses for over 29 years and I am never ill from viruses or anything external to my body, nor do you need to be either. I never have Flu shots or vaccines. This method is practiced by the Indian's in India, The Turks (who call it their 2 day cure) Confirmed by a Medical University in Alberta, Steve Kirsch (at last) and several other civilizations. It washes out the nasal passages, behind the eyes, brain stem, brain bulb, the escutcheon tubes to the inner ears (and is possibly good for Long Covid too), where Covid likes to inhabit
your life, your choice - when you think how easy it is to kill viruses, then you have to wonder why these vaccines. You cannot catch Covid. you have to catch a Coronavirus (or bacteria) first and let it potentially become Covid over the 5 to 10 days of self isolation, like duh!! - pass it on to anyone who will listen please. Richard Noakes
Mark - The key points from 'Virus Mania' are incontrovertible. Well observed and QED.
Cathy - The 'Spanish' label was purely related to press freedom(s), and non-participation in the European war theatre. Virus-wise, you might want to do some basic research into an experimental meningitis vaccine tested on the military at Fort Riley. Check the timings and troop deployments.
Greg - Germ theory vs terrain theory...courtesy of M Pasteur, a lot of microbiology today hinged on the fulcrum of a plagiarising charlatan. I get your point, but once you've gone down one pathway, there aren't any more forks in the road...
I do wonder why you haven't cited any real reasons for thinking what you say nor have you mentioned that failing to prove something exists is not the same as proving that it doesn't exist. Not that I know what's going on myself, but I'm sorely disappointed that you haven't presented a better case, and instead have seen fit to waffle for a long time about your own theories about what is, and is not, happening. You also so casually dismiss the experience of so many who experienced an illness quite unlike any other they had had in a lifetime of colds and flus, and are in so many cases still suffering its aftereffects quite unlike the other colds and flus they have had. An interesting theory of yours, that suddenly colds and flus have become more dangerous than normal because of environmental factors. It could be the case but having experienced this thing myself, away from any cellphone towers, and along with eight other family members from different households miles apart, I don't think that can explain it. It was nothing like any flu I have ever had in my long life of many illnesses. Nothing at all and I had neither a nasal drip nor a cough. The same went for everyone else in our group. Obviously this proves nothing, but it makes me even less impressed by your sweeping statements and claim to know things which it seems unlikely you have the scientific background that would qualify you for an opinion - even if scientists are all brainwashed they at least know how to present a proper case. I have loved many of your articles but I feel you have strayed away from areas you are in any way qualified to write about. And perhaps this is the sort of thing has given those who dare to disagree with the official narrative such a bad reputation. I foolishly listened to those who claimed there was no illness and no virus, and that was how we managed to infect our aged parents who both suffered very badly. I became more humble after that.
Thank you Richard - I have a similar method - immersing myself in the sea. Easy for me to do where I live in a temperate climate. A very, very effective cleansing ritual.
Thanks everyone for (in the main!) very interesting and well observed comments.
To Sophia, your comment is disrespectful and rude. For someone who claims to have enjoyed my previous work, to address me in such an impolite way simply because I reasonably expressed a view you disagree with, is not acceptable.
To disagree is fine. But you haven't addressed or countered any of the arguments I carefully constructed, preferring instead to insult me and arrogantly dismiss what I have written as "waffle". This shows me you have no case. You have not answered any of the questions I pose in the article (they're not rhetorical). You certainly haven't read the book or watched the documentary series I linked. You have simply lashed out and tried to belittle me into silence, JUST like the "normies" do to the rest of us. This is unacceptable behaviour.
I want to make it clear to people who persist in this approach that they will have their posting rights on my site (that I maintain and pay for) terminated permanently. I am not providing a platform for people to speak to me like that.
Disagreement is fine. State your case in a reasonable and courteous way. But to come onto someone's personal space to belittle and insult them - someone who's time, skill, and labour you openly admit to benefitting from in the past - is completely unacceptable.
If you find my house rules unacceptable, then please leave. No further comment is necessary (and as I said, further rude comments won't be published).
A fabulous piece of writing. Accurate in everything you say. The problem is people cannot fathom that what they or their loved ones had when they fell ill or died was simply seasonal flu. Flu didn't disappear as we know. Until people understand and accept this we will get nowhere.
They did a cracking job at letting people believe in the illusion of a virus.
Great article.
I have been saying the very same thing since the beginning of the scamdemic. You don't need an actual virus; you just need the illusion of one for people to lose their minds.
Apart from the obvious reasons, why else would TPTB be so keen to poison, starve, and malnourish us?
"How do you make these particles called a 'virus'? It's clear - you starve and poison tissue, and it breaks down into a 'virus'. How do you make a person sick? You starve and poison them and then they break down into these pieces, and we call it a 'virus'."
Tom Cowan (excerpt from the documentary series 'The Viral Delusion').
So, poison people with all manner of toxins, malnourish and (preferably) starve them, blame their natural internal detoxifying responses on an external virus/invader, cripple their natural 'mental' defences with fear, then pump them full of even more poison💉💉💉to protect them from (100% 'inevitable'😱) life threatening 'external' attacks (a cycle that will dramatically shorten peoples lives).
"In principle the war effort is always planned to keep society on the brink of starvation. The war is waged by the ruling group against its own subjects...to keep the very structure of society intact."
George Orwell
There is NO virus - and if you were "iller than I've ever been before in my life" it was because your body's natural detoxifying process was being stretched to the limit due to your ongoing exposure to an increasingly toxic environment.
To put it bluntly, you felt shit because you were full of shit, and the subsequent (natural, albeit extremely unpleasant) cleaning process is what you were experiencing - NOT the effects of being ravaged by an some external invading 'virus'.
"Penetration into dark recesses: a great effort of will finds favour.
At times, one has to deal with hidden evils: intangible influences that slink in dark corners and affect people by suggestion. One must trace these back to the most secret recesses in order to deal with them. The effort required is enormous, but worthwhile, for, only when such elusive influences are brought into the light of day and branded do they lose power over people."
I Ching, Wilhelm translation, Hexagram 57, line 2.
"We don't catch diseases. We build them." Antoine Bechamp
"Let them eat cake."
Marie Antoinette
Very well said.
I'm a proud conspiracy factist and I've openly described Covid as a hoax right from the start.
I remember going into our local post office 2+years ago. They had lotion to put on your hands and notices regarding social distancing etc. I said to the counter clerk "how many people do you KNOW who have been seriously ill or have died from Covid?" She said "well, there's that woman on telly whose husband is very ill" (!). I could hardly believe that this was seen as someone she knew, and she was completely unphased by the fact that she didn't really KNOW anyone who had been ill with Covid.
That woman on the telly is Kate Garraway, and her husband is the politico Derek Draper. Seems like a psyop to me, the kind of thing the Sage nudge unit might come up with.
Off topic, but the Dover "bombing" also seems very iffy to me. The culprit, we are told, later asphyxiated himself somehow at a nearby Petrol Station, but there were no details of how that was done in a public service station. Very convenient. Was the aim of the whole show to demonise right wing anti-immigrant types?
Dear Miri
You are an exceptional writer and a true champion of the fight against the covidSCAM and its associated crimes. I (and all my colleagues at SBG) hold you in the highest regard.
None of us have said, or ever would say "trust the experts". Constant questioning of experts has never been more essential.
However, you have, in your article, entered into an area where we happen to have FIRST HAND direct personal, professional experience over a period of some 45 years - virology, pathology and microbiology.
We (at SBG) have observed, FIRST HAND, in military-grade laboratories, the replication, isolation and at-scale SAMPLING of VIRII both in-vivo AND in-vitro! Furthermore; there are well documented replicatable, reproducible, repeatable laboratory procedures to demonstrate that virii DO CAUSE Disease and the mechanisms are OBSERVABLY consistent. Of course the demonstrated existence of virii and the demonstrated causal relationship with disease does not preclude that virii have been blamed in cases where the pathogen is NOT a coincidently present virus or even where NO virus is present at all.
I certainly have no intention to offend or demean but had observed statements that were profoundly and demonstrably UNTRUE. Perpetuation of such untruths risk undermining the growing acceptance that a huge fraud has been perpetrated and the credibility of its unravelling.
Please accept our criticisms in the spirit intended, viz; to help build a ROBUSTLY CREDIBLE dismantling of the CovidFRAUD.
Sincerely, and with very best wishes,
Greg
Greg,
You have not addressed any of Miri's questions, you have simply stated that virii do cause disease.
Which statements are "profoundly and demonstrably UNTRUE" and why dont you explain to us why?
Who is SBG, never heard of them.(yes I did a search)
You dont even provide any links to your "well documented" procedures.
In other words you bring nothing to the table.
Thanks for adjusting your tone, Greg, it's appreciated, but Scott is right. You still haven't addressed anything I've said.
I have a question for you and for Sophia. You both openly admit to having consumed and enjoyed my content for a long time. Obviously, this takes me a lot of time to create, and you are benefitting from my skill, my experience, and my labour, as well as commenting on a platform that I paid to have developed and pay hosting fees for. So, have either of you ever contributed anything at all in return to compensate me for entertaining you for all this time? Or have you just taken it for free and then when I dare to say something you disagree with, lashed out? I've done a search in my donations records for both of your email addresses, and as far as I can see, you've never contributed a penny - but please do correct me if I am wrong.
Greg - what is your process for isolating a virus? Could this process, or the ingredients involved in it, be producing objects that are incorrectly identified as a virus?
Nice. I came to the same conclusions over the last 2.5 years.
We know that malaria is caused by a parasite, whereas yellow fever, dengue fever, zika and others are all 'viruses' spread by the mosquito Aedes aegypti. We also know that the US military carried out experiments with mosquitos and measles, where they tried to spread the disease without success. When AIDS first appeared, Floridians were frightened to death that the disease might be spread by mosquitos. Research proved this not to be true. Ergo Aedes aegypti cannot be spreading a virus. So what is it spreading?
I suspect that in answering this question we might uncover a parasitic bioweapon that has had gain-of-function research applied, and against which Ivermectin happens to be rather effective.
I am with you 100% on this Miri - and nice to have you coherently answer the questions people throw out in response to this jaw-dropper.. Havent we all learnt so much this fluvid period! German New Medicine (GNM) helps show ways that groups of people get the same illness ( without it being contagion) --- separation conflict ( new kids at school) Territorial loss conflict - refugees displaced groups etc etc...( check it out!) Even all that excitement early on about 'where the virus came from' - all BS ! i stop reading anyone now who even considers a virus to be real. I so hope this info can be widely accepted when Jab deaths mount up. AIDS is another pharmacy made killer - as you will have seen on 'The Viral Delusion' - wasnt it even Pfizer that manufactured the ( toxic) Poppers ?! Anyway - baby steps i guess - lets get the world used to flu-vid being fake first. Excellent blog.
Thanks for this exceptionally interesting article Miri, well written and articulate as always. I have always bought into "germ theory", assuming it was correct because the "experts" said so and because I was indoctrinated by the system to accept it. However, over the past 3 or so years I've begun to question my life long beliefs. I have no doubt that the Covid 'pandemic' was a hoax and merely a very effective psychological exercise and this has led me to look further into "germ theory". While I am still not 100% convinced I'd definitely say my instinct now steers me more toward terrain theory. I still have some unanswered questions but thank you for the suggested book and documentary, I shall read and watch both with interest.
Thanks again for yet another interesting and thought provoking piece of writing, you have supplied me once again with with the basis for some very interesting discussions with my family. Keep up the good work.
Forgot to say in earlier comment that when people say " i was really ill" ---the added respiratory conditions that made the illness far worse were highly likely from fear. In GNM the lungs get inflammation in order to deal with the extra oxygen needed when in a state of fear. We have had 2 years of fear propaganda and it has affected most people -whether fear of a 'lethal virus' or of a totalitarian control state taking over. The propaganda has literally caused the worser symptoms people have had. Self -sustaining broadcasts - some conscience-less individuals must have been slapping their thighs in delight when this happened. Human tendencies towards believing anyone in a white coat has made the whole scam quite easy to maintain by just a few very corrupt persons.
Fantastically accurate summary.
Miri,
I came across your site last week. A lot of very interesting articles which are well researched, written and thought-provoking. Like you I believe it's the terrain and that the germ theory is nonsense. I'm not being disparaging but IMO there are a few flaws to this missive which need to be ironed out asap. We all want to avoid wrong turns when going down rabbit holes, don't we?
This is how i see it.
1. There are no viruses.
2. There is no immune system
3. Antibodies don't exist
When we have a respiratory detox, enzymes are produced by the body to help break down the poisons. These are the viruses you elude to. It could be argued that it's a matter of semantics. If you want to call enzymes, viruses. then viruses exist. Interestingly soaps contain enzymes, so your description of viruses oooops enzymes being soaps is indeed a correct one.
Another reason the germ theory is baloney is, why don't viruses spread to all parts of the body? Why are they organ specific? Respiratory viruses, liver viruses etc. Hepatitus is in reality your liver detoxing. It's not caused by a virus. They will tell you one way hepatitus is transmitted is by drug users, especially hard drug users, sharing dirty needles. No, no no! The liver in certain circumstances just can't process the sheer amount of toxicity and has to call in help, which the body does in the form of enzymes. Another nonsense associated with the crackpot germ theory can be posed by this question. Why do some viruses constantly evolve into variants while others don't. You ever heard of new strains of chicken pox? The omicron variant of chick pox for example.
If you don't have invading pathogens, you don't need an immune system. There is nothing to be immune from. I've tested this idea on a few people. When they mention an immune system I say "you don't have an immune system" They look at me bewildered, so before they have time to recompose themselves and formulate some claptrap answer, I stop them digging a very big hole for themselves and say "OK then where is it?" They are again absolutely speechless. I tell them "your body basically has ten systems: skeletal, muscular, nervous, cardovascular, respiratory, digestive, urinary, endocrine, lymph and reproductive. There are diagrams of all of them outlined by a human body. Ever seen one of the immune system? "
No invading pathogens then why does the body need to produce antibodies? It doesn't. The whole concept that you have all these antibodes swilling around in your blood and lymph in response to all the viruses you've encountered is mind boggling. Tackling every new virus and viral variant would means another set of antibodies to add to the vast collection already swilling around your body.
What exactly are they seeing when they mention antibodies? Before the scamdemic, I'd never ever heard there was anything else other than germs and malnutrition to explain disease. I'm relatively new to the terrain way of thinking so I don't profess to be and expert and know all the answers. In fact I doubt there's a human on the planet who knows exactly what is going on. Back to the "what exactly are they seeing when they mention antibodies?" From what I can make out, when they see antibodies, it's one stage of the somatid cycle. I believe the body has two systems of cleansing itself. It's primary one is the use of the somatid cycle. The secondary one (enzymatic) is used when the internal enviroment is too toxic for the first one.
Antoine Bechamp talked about microzymas and microzymian theory. Later scientists who took on Bechamp's work called microzymas other names e.g. somatids
This guy explains the somatid cycle although I notice he mentions 11 bodily systems. Organs! I'd never thought of organs as a bodily system before
https://michaeljloomis.com/somatic-life-cycle/
I'll leave it at that for now beacause I might be teaching grandma to suck eggs. If not I'll be back to share some more thoughts and links to people who I consider to be on the right track. Hopefully I am able to reference some of the points I have made. I've read and watched so much that often I can't remember exactly where I've read or watched what I've learnt.
Another great article.
I can confirm that I get 'a cold' every time I drink way too much alcohol. It's just the body de-toxing I've come to realise.
Dr. Ryke Geerd Hamer, a proper 'expert', for some of the nay-sayers here, did some fabulous research on cancer to form his German New Medicine approach. The mind does play an integral role in health.
https://www.richplanet.net/richp_genre.php?ref=280&part=1&gen=9
And when people tell me I have the most switched-on, best behaved kids (happens a lot) and ask me what's the secret, I tell them honestly and frankly that they've never had poison injected in their veins and never will. Then I watch their faces when they realise that I'm.....gulp....an anti-vaxxer!!!!
I'll be making a donation to you soon, get you some oatcakes (never realised you were a fellow Stokey til recently).
Covid was the greatest threat to humanity yet the supermarket was open. At this point, anybody with a brain should've realised that this whole thing was a nothing burger and a complete scam. This whole episode reaffirmed my belief in the terrain theory. As Miri states, if viruses were so contagious, everybody would be ill all of the time. Obvious really
Hi Miri
First time reader, as a friend posted this article. I had a read, very interesting, and so were the comments. Thanks for writing.
I'm no virologist or expert in anything except maybe logic (I was a programmer in previous lives - when I say previous lives I don't mean in the woo reincarnation superstition, just that I've changed career a few times and I'm now 52).
1) Why are "terrain theory" and "germ theory" mutually exclusive? Here's a hypothesis, terrain makes me ill through toxins etc. It's too much for my body (for whatever reasons) at the time therefore my body gets ill and excretes viruses (or soap to use your analogy). I like this analogy, but let me look at it from another perspective. If I'm washing my hands with actual soap to clean my dirty hands, then I shake hands with my friend who has clean hands - without removing the dirty soap from my hands, my friend's hands will now be dirty. So I got dirty coz of the environment (terrain theory) but my friend got dirty coz of me (germ theory). What logical reason is there why illnesses can't act the same way?
2) I was also curious about your Chicken Pox example. Could it be that scientists simply aren't testing for new variants (after all there's no profit in that virus coz we all know how to treat it for free), or that there aren't variants coz the virus hasn't evolved because there was no need, there's a homeostasis in that the virus is in no danger of disappearing so there's evolutionary need for it to change much. Anyway a quick net search yielded this new(ish) variant of the varicella zoster virus (VZV) in 1998:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2738511/
3) To be clear, I agree this was all a big hoax, but to me it was a hoax of rebranding a new variant of the common cold, which as you state is indeed deadly to millions and has been since forever.
Cheers
Omar
Omar
You don't excrete a virus. I'd prefer to call it an enzyme. Poisons are broken down by enzymes, internally.
I have linked to a brilliant video. It explains how many conditions have similar symptons and are given different names. By doing this you can eliminate certain diseases using word terminology.
There's loads of innteresting information for you to glean. Remember this point; epidemics are introduced by one big collective term and are ended not by vaccination but by splitting the collective term into sub labels. I urge everyone to watch this video. All will become clear,
https://www.bitchute.com/video/KVt9ZJL2Bmtx/
I'll add further that pandemics don't come or go. They come and go using word magic.
Early morning tought. Animals detox too, just like humans. However the same myth is perpetuated. It's a virus. Avian flu, bird flu, swine flu et al. All this leads nother myth......zoonotic diseases. And think about it, that's where AIDS from a monkey and COVID 19 from a bat are supposed to have originated.
Interesting comments and one I have thought about now for some time. In my household of 5 everyone got sick at the start except for me. I wouldn't have had any "anti-bodies" (being a new "virus") and I certainly wasn't keeping distance or cleaning my hands every two minutes. I hardly ever wore the mask outside and when I realised how bad they were I ditched that as well. So why did they get infected and not me. Maybe the fear of getting ill made them ill,or maybe they were detoxing and I wasn't? Another question for me then is what about bacteria and fungi? Are they the causes for disease or is it something different altogether?