18 comments on “Press conference analysis: Dr. Malhotra calls for immediate suspension of Covid vaccines”

1. Test

2. The fact he was still pushing the existence of Covid19 and it’s variants was a red flag for me.

3. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. of The Children’s Health Defense, Del Bigtree of ICAN, and Dr. Robert Malone all oppose the Covid vaccine but are vigorous defenders of “safe vaccines”, and (in my opinion) are controlled opposition. I suspect that Dr. Malhotra is also being used by the powers that should not be. It remains to be seen whether he is complicit in their scheme.

4. “Here is the cold hard truth that everyone in this country MUST understand RIGHT NOW.

   None of the so=called “leaders” in the anti-vax/pro-health freedom movement are on our side. They are all undercover agents, working for Pro-Pharma, Pro-Vax agendas and getting paid very well for their fake opposition efforts.

   They run charity scams and fake opposition organizations in order to CONTROL THE OPPOSITION AND CREATE FALSE NARRATIVES.”

   From the paper “Paul Put the “Offit” in Profit”:

   https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BZxo-My9mdNKrQKkhdDqxSgvC7mrtFnWklp-IJrEkB0/edit#heading=h.bwgah6wud9cr

5. Bravo 👏 another well written and thought provoking article. I too wanted a hero and thought he could be it. But then thought again this is a long game. Great that some will wake up to the harms as more on ‘our’ side would be good but the establishment will manage the great reveal to their own advantage. Thought the Italian lady pm had fire in her belly until I found out she was a member of the Aspen Institute. The one ABOVE the WEF. It’s a long war against us.

6. Hi Miri,
   I gave up 2 hours of my life to watch it too (like you I prefer to get my information by reading rather than watching, but made an exception for this). This was my FB comment straight afterwards, which I think chimes with yours:

   "Well that was a disappointment. Aseem Malhotra and Ryan Coles' talks were good as far as they went, but went on far too long (2 hours in total) for what was meant to be a press conference. The general background of pharma corruption is important, but should have been dealt with far more briefly to allow more focus on the evidence against the novel gene therapies, and Ryan Coles' talk would have gone over the head of anyone from the MSM present - which of course was the big problem. None of the MSM (apart from GB News, if they count) was there, so once again it was preaching to the choir. Looks like we're going to have to wait a bit longer for The Great Reveal."

   I think Aseem Malhotra fits into the category of Limited Hangout, rather than Controlled Opposition. Knowingly or not (and in his case, I think genuinely unknowingly), they're there to reveal truths that can no longer be hidden, but also to divert attention away from the rest of it. His defence of the smallpox vaccine for half of the front page of his article is a huge red flag, as anyone who's done any research at all into the subject would know it's the most deadly vaccine in history and had nothing to do with the eradication of smallpox. The fact that he stood up there today and said he believed in all the other vaccines, just not these ones, shows to me that he's just a (probably unwitting, I'll give him that) part of a damage limitation exercise.

7. Sometimes I am happy that I watched tv in the 80's/90's. The X files -'question everything' I do! Blessings lovely lady x

8. So sad everyone is under scrutiny and suspicion. I too watched and was disappointed that Dr. Maholtra defended all other vaccines. I would assume his defense would include mandated childhood vaccines for school entry. If so, right there I'd have to think he's not on the level considering how MANY vaccines kids must inject for school entry. He claims he believes his father died from the cvd injection(s). I read the Dr. may be in the process of planning suing for his father's death due to cvd vaccine injury. (heart attack) Is this why he has interest in presenting information at this press conference that would support and bolster his lawsuit perhaps? Agree that Maholtra is very easy on the eyes and he's smooth in his delivery and well polished. Should good genes be held against him? Or is there more to him being able to escape being silenced and cancelled as others have been before him? Is anyone deserving of being 100% truthworthy when it comes to speaking out about how dangerous these warp speeded, no liability, experimental, gene therapy injections are? We just had the Nuremberg 2.0 soap opera s**t show finale. Is there any hope that truth and justice exists. I wonder.

9. I too gave up two and a half hours to watch the press release and have followed Dr Malhotra's work for several years.

   His premise that many illnesses can be treated with dietary interventions (carbohydrate restriction to halt or reverse metabolic diseases) and the profiteering by big pharma does not sit well with the assertion that vaccines are safe interventions. Even the outcomes from Edward Jenner's breakthrough do not hold up well under scrutiny.

   His initial section was long and personal as are the two parts of his published research. His argument is built well but seems a little too personal for academia. It is populist which may get more people to read and take note at the same time as allowing academics to dismiss message.

   Dr Cole went into a lot of detail about the take up of the vaccine in the cell which may well have flown over the heads of any average media punter with a basic science qualification.

   Personally, I hope that this is another nudge in the direction of truth coming out. I hope too that those of us who did our research at the beginning will be found to be wrong and that these vaccines are not going to be the disaster we fear.

10. You're a breath of fresh air Miri. I watched too. That phrase "wilfully blind" in the video smacks - at what point do they call it criminal negligence...

11. Unfortunately, when you have been trained and working in the medical industry for years and you become a dr you are at the end of the day - endoctrinated. I think it’s unfair to literally make every matter complicated and sinister in some way. I know Aseem. He is first a Dr and second someone who is vigilantly trying to uncovered fact from fiction. But still as human as every other person who vehemently believes that vaccines are modern miracles until, well, you learn that they are not. We need to stop judging people’s journeys. Many of us knew from day dot that this was all going to turn in to the shit show it has - that was never clear to those who believe firmly in our modern medical prowess. But once you open a can of worms you can’t close it - so when you start looking at data and realising that all those smoking guns actually point to something, you start changing your own tune. Give the man time. And there is a good reason he is being allowed to speak about these things on say GB news and not SKY or BBC - deplatforming has not happened to many high profile mainstreamers - YET. He has been very strategic and measured and will only believe & speak once he’s seen the data for himself. Some of us simply have had more years to discover the truth and others still rely on their taught way of deciphering scientific data. Not everything is as calculated as we like to make it up. At the end of the day we’re all mere humans trying to do our best in the world with what our own brains know and understand - frustrating as that may be for the rest of us.

12. This is the first time I am reading your work, Miri. I think you have great critical thinking skills and intuition.
    I was out on disability after 15 years of being an RN in geriatric and medical-surgical hospital settings, when the 2009 H1N1 rolled out as a so-called pandemic. Being at home and with both my children out of the home, I was able to really absorb and see how the MSM was handling the messaging of this outbreak. It was like a light bulb went off in my head. Due to a medical journalist from Europe and others I came in contact with, I started to understand this global agenda using vaccination. I started to question the HIV scourge, Lyme Disease that came in the 1990s and the respiratory outbreaks of the 21st Century. I started to realize where Autism was coming from and it’s ever increasing rate in our children based on more and more vaccines in the childhood vaccination schedule here in the US. I started researching Smallpox and polio and as time went on we saw the emergence of Ebola, Nipah, Zika and other outbreaks. I was suspecting much of these emerging diseases were being created by man and being spread, too, by vaccines.
    Going back to my opening gambit, I find it curious that in the 2009-10 H1N1 “pandemic,” a vaccine was rolled out in a six month period. How come so many doctors during this SARS-CoV-2 “pandemic” stated that it takes seven or more years to create a vaccine? Just because the H1N1 was a purported combination of flu viruses— avian, swine and some strain coming from the 1918-20 “Spanish Flu Pandemic” vs a “novel” corona virus? Here is the timeline to the H1N1 response.
    https://www.cdc.gov/flu/pandemic-resources/2009-pandemic-timeline.html

13. Dr Peter McCullough and Dr Robert Malone also said that all other vaccines were safe for a long time, until they were convinced to do due diligence on them as well. And neither of them were de-platformed for quite some time.

    Dr Maholtra hasn't been public for long at all - not nearly as long as all the other doctors, before they were de-platformed.

    I agree with you that a weak point is that he still considers the other vaccines okay.

    He deserves the opportunity to show whether or not he's a one-trick-pony strategically placed to critique one vaccine, or whether or not he will do due diligence on other vaccines, as have some of the other doctors.

    All through the decades, challenging vaccines has been professional suicide, though it always takes a measure of time for bodies like the BMA and the GMC to gang up on a doctor... so in the not too distant future we will know the real face of Maholtra...

    To that end, I put this on his facebook page today:

    I have been involved in the vaccine critical movement since 1984, and have extensive read in the medical literature and listened to past whistle blowers, and seen my own sets of leaked documents, over the decades.

    As such, there are a few perhaps rhetorical questions to you might want to consider:

    1) Why was it that so many of us, with no medical training, could see that the emperor had no clothes, and you could not until your father suffered?

    2) Have you done the same rigorous analysis of all the previous vaccines, or even just Gardasil 4 and Gardasil 9, as you have done for the covid vaccine?

    3) If not, why do you take the same position as you once did about covid vaccines, and assume that all the other vaccines are equally as safe and effective as you once promoted covid vaccines to be?

    You don't have to answer, but in the interests of science I would suggest that at the very least, you take the same approach to looking at the Gardasil vaccines. Not only will that shock you, but it might make you take a broader approach to supporting real science.

    You might want to start with this paper, and then start answering the huge questions this carefully worded paper raises:

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35981903/

14. In reply to Mike Baker,

    Yes Aseem Maholtra needs to consider the work of another doctor with skin in the game, who did do due diligence on the smallpox vaccine:

    https://odysee.com/@drsuzanneh:f/smallpoxillusionsautismone:9

15. Very good analysis,

    I think it's essential to have a dialogue on what constitutes 'controlled opposition' and what that means, because as you infer, the most effective way of doing this, is to recruit or use well meaning people without their knowledge.

    I would dare to say that they probably had a lot of this worked out well in advance, in terms of knowing who was likely to come forward, whether they were going to pose any real threat, and how they could be nudged and guided along a certain trajectory from a distance. Needless to say there are undoubtedly a handful of genuine sleeper agents out there who were trained specifically to come forward and lead the charge at the right time - I think we could probably agree on who these individuals most likely are.

    The method will depend on the individual and the circumstances, but in terms of unwitting or semi-witting patsies etc, they clearly pick ambitious, career-focused individuals for promotion in the media. I.e. people who will tell the public what they want to hear, but who will ultimately limit the scope of their criticisms or direct the blame somewhere other than where it really needs to go. Simply speaking, people who they can count on to instinctively know what's out of bounds and play the game within certain parameters - because that's what they've always done.

    In any case, there will always be a caveat, as there was with Dr Malhotra. You don't get anywhere near a TV camera until you've demonstrated that you have a price. The only people you can trust to give you the full truth without pushing ulterior motives or leading you down the garden path, are people who have got nothing to lose.

    But as you say, if we are discerning, we don't have to 'follow' anyone, and can watch from a distance with intrigue. The problem is the majority of the general public, who need a leader and instructions.

16. Adding to my previous comment, here is another factor to consider.

    A lot of these so-called whistleblowers and media influencers have publicly addressed this topic in waves. I.e. they did not say anything until it had become socially acceptable, until someone else was talking about it, until the green light had been given. The degree to which the jab has been criticised increases in waves, even though the scientific basis for that criticism long pre-existed the criticism itself - the detractors tend to get louder together, according to how much they feel secure in saying.

    For example, there were people out there talking about topics such as the Great Reset in April 2020, but the same media pundits who ignored or laughed at them then, now address this topic as if they had 'always known', as if it was self evident. Same with the vaccine - what of all the people who managed to figure out almost all the consequences of the jab by December 2020?

    Nobody knows their names. We only know the names of the ones who've been thrust in front of us by social media algorithms - and that includes the ones who got world famous for being banned on Twitter.. Are we supposed to believe that Twitter didn't anticipate this? Please. It's the oldest trick in the book.

    Timing and promotion are everything.

17. In reply to Hilary Butler:

    Coincidentally, I'm reading Suzanne Humphries's book at the moment. The current thing is like the smallpox vaccine story speeded up x100:
    - "safe and effective"
    - "lifelong immunity"
    - "stops transmission"
    - vaccine mandates
    - 6-monthly boosters
    - "reduces transmission"
    - "mild illness"
    - "pandemic of the unvaccinated"
    - refusal to publish data
    - mass opposition
    - eventual defeat of the mandates.

    I may have missed a few parallels. My favourite bit was the 100,000-strong 1885 Leicester demonstration, where they repeatedly hung Edward Jenner in effigy on a working gallows. Somehow that bit seems to have got missed out of the history books.

18. This is beginning of the switcheroo as pre-planned by the good folks at John’s Hopkins in their Spars exercise. https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/our-work/pubs_archive/pubs-pdfs/2017/spars-pandemic-scenario.pdf