(This is part two of a three part series: please see part one here.)

For the last few years, there has been a general sense amongst those who are interested in such things that "the dominoes are starting to fall", insofar as shady celebrities and dubious public figures are being exposed for what they really are and "dealt with". People point to the sudden disappearance of previously prolific Tweeter, Tom Hanks, from the platform in 2020 (Hanks abruptly stopped Tweeting in May of that year, whilst rumours swirled that he had been arrested, or even killed, for his involvement in unconscionable activities involving children).

Meanwhile, Prince Andrew was revealed as having close, personal ties to paedophile sex trafficker, Jeffrey Epstein, and his accomplice, Ghislaine Maxwell, a revelation that has left an indelible stain on the Royal Family, with Andrew effectively 'cancelled' as a working Royal. A once highly eligible and popular 'party prince', Andrew is now a social and professional pariah: a source of great shame and embarrassment to the world's most famous family.

And, finally, we have perhaps the most staggering expose of all - the fashion house Balenciaga, and its recent obscene promotional campaign involving explicit references to child pornography and sado-masochism involving children.

So, if it was not obvious in the lead up to the Balenciaga campaign, it should certainly be obvious now: these "revelations" are being delivered on purpose. The dominoes may indeed be falling, but for that to happen, someone has to set them up, and someone has to knock them down. Who is doing that? The very same people who allowed these individuals and organisations to ascend to prominence in the first place.

Balenciaga is a world-famous high fashion house over a century old. It directly employs well over 1,000 people, and deals with eye-wateringly large marketing budgets involving the best advertising and PR whizzes money can buy.

Do you think they released this campaign by mistake?

This campaign was dreamed up by top marketing executives on seven-figure salaries in the most exclusive boardrooms on Madison Avenue, and they knew exactly what impact it would have.

The references to child porn were not, after all, exactly subtle - they were as glaring and explicit and obvious as it is possible to be without actually breaking the law. Nobody involved in the production of this campaign expected the public not to notice them.

We were expected to notice them. We were expected to be horrified and aghast by them. We were expected to go after Balenciaga, demanding, "something must be done!"

Because all of this - Hanks (remember his face as Ricky Gervais gave his scathing speech at the Golden Globes?), Prince Andrew, Balenciaga - is all planned: all part of a carefully controlled demolition of our culture, and a necessary step to destroying a culture, is to reveal it as rotten and cancerous to its core. There is no more repulsive crime than child abuse, so that is what it is being revealed to us as being at the dark heart of our culture: that Hollywood is riddled with it. That the Royal Family is infected by it. That aspirational high-end cultural institutions like top fashion houses are plagued by it. And, of course (and has been long since known), it absolutely infests politics.

Once the average person truly realises what our society is really built on - institutions and individuals compromised in the worst possible ways - how are they going to react? They will react with fury and outrage and demand that these disgusting institutions are razed to the ground, the perpetrators annihilated, and the whole system done away with and replaced with something new.

This is the age-old political tactic, "the manufacture of consent", whereby social engineers are able to introduce their desired social changes by manipulating the public into believing they want them. It is the desire of the ruling classes to completely destroy the existing order and replace it with something new ("build back better" as they keep robotically incanting every time they get the chance), but it's very difficult for them to do this without majority consent, so they are in the process of revealing our existing order as so replusive, that nobody in their right mind would want to salvage it and everyone will cheer as it is burnt to the ground.

This "reveal" - the dominoes falling - is all being expertly controlled and stage-managed by those at the top of the power pyramid (just as all major world events are), which you can easily determine by asking the usual questions - why this, why now? The people and bodies mentioned in this article - Hollywood actors, Royals, top fashionistas - have been up to no good for decades, why are they only being exposed now? Why haven't their crimes just been routinely covered up, as they have been for years / decades / centuries? Why are some being exposed now, whilst others are still protected?

It's because it's all being managed and done in stages, in the way that will best serve the social controllers and their ultimate aims. They know that human psyches can only cope with so much scandal and stress at once, so they are leaking these shocking revelations strategically, one by one, not too much too fast. For instance, with Tom Hanks, there were only rumours. With Prince Andrew, it's obvious he kept very dubious company and was caught being overly-familiar with a teenage girl - but, as yet, he has not been convicted of any crime, and even were it proven true that he slept with his accuser, she was 17 at the time, which is over the age of consent in the UK. Obviously, a middle-aged man sleeping with a teenager is both inappropriate and creepy, and if she was forced into this, it's abhorrent and highly illegal - but by UK law, would not constitute paedophilia.

So all of this has had a very "limited hangout" feel to it - rumours, insinuations, and accusations, hinting strongly at what high-profile public figures really are, but not quite proving it. All those names on Epstein's flight log, but still nobody has been directly exposed and convicted of anything.

However: then we have Balenciaga. With everything up to that, there's a degree of plausible deniability. Prince Andrew denies ever sleeping with Virginia Guiffre, and so far, nobody has been able to prove unequivocally that he did. The actor Armie Hammer, grandson of the so-called "most Satanic man in the world", has been accused by a string of ex-partners of horrendous abuse up to and including cannibalism - but nobody has been able to prove anything and Hammer continues to live as a free man.

But there is no denying anything with the Balenciaga campaign, and there is not supposed to be. It explicitly depicts child abuse in a way that nobody can excuse or deny, and that is because the "great reveal" is gathering pace. The ruling classes know exactly how to manipulate the mass mind, and that to hit us with "too much too soon" would shut people down, so they've done it in stages, revealing gradually more and more, until the crescendo when they fully come out of the shadows and show us what our culture really is.

Note: in the Balenciaga campaign, they even make a point in one shot of spelling it Baalenciaga. You know, Baal, the transgendered devil-like deity said to be worshipped by the upper-class Satanists who rule the world. "Conspiracy theorists" have said for years that this is the "God" the ruling classes and ultra-wealthy worship, and now they are clearly confirming it (some have suggested that "Baal en ci aga" translates in some dialects as "Baal is the King").

More such confirmation is to come. I'd keep an eye on Andrew Tate (more on him in part three), a well-known figure in alternative circles for some time, who has now shot to mainstream prominence courtesy of an interview with Piers Morgan, where he very explicitly laid plain the facts of the Covid scam. Piers - most unusually for him - did not shout over Tate or start calling him names, he just calmly let him speak.

This is because "the great reveal" is meant to happen and big league players like Morgan are all in on it, and have been told when and how to start revealing the truth (or bits of it) to the masses (something I put to Morgan in my open letter, which was shared by thousands, including Matt Le Tissier, James Delingpole, and Bev Turner, and that he certainly read).

Andrew Tate has spoken recently of the ruling classes' credo, "revelation of the method", that they always have to tell us what they're doing to, in their eyes, absolve them of any karmic debt. If they tell us, and we don't stop them, that qualifies as our consent and so they are permitted to continue.

The reason Tate is especially fluent on this is that he - like all who rise to mainstream prominence - is in the club. Do you think there is any remote possibility he would have appeared, uncensored and unshouted at, on Piers Morgan if he wasn't? Nobody is given a prominent mainstream platform if they're not a controllable asset who's in the club - nobody.

The ruling classes have often revealed their plans more euphemistically and subtly in the past - through symbolism and coded messages, in Hollywood films particularly - but now they are being more overt and plain because as we build up to the apex of their revelations, they want to ensure absolutely nobody is left in any doubt.

So please expect the pace to pick up over the forthcoming months and years, with ever more shocking and scandalous revelations about some of the celebrities and institutions our culture holds most dear.

This begs the question, of course, of - once the exposure and subsequent destruction is complete - what comes next?

Please see part three of this series for an in-depth analysis of the next stage.

Thanks for reading! This site is 100% reader funded, with no advertisements, paywalls, or wealthy corporate backers - making it truly independent. If you would like to contribute to help this resource remain both independent and free to all, please do so through Patreon, BuyMeACoffee or bank transfer to: Nat West, a/c 30835984, s/c 54-10-27, account name FINCH MA. Your support is really appreciated. Thank you.