(To listen to this article as an audio file, please visit my YouTube Channel. First published April 8th, 2023)

It was one of the more imaginative political pantomime plot twists of recent months to hear last week that "famed anti-vaxxer", and scion of the world's most renowned political dynasty, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., is running for president. Sort of like hearing Andrew Wakefield is: on the surface, you think, "God, there could hardly be a more hated pariah amongst the normies, he's got no chance!" - but if you dig a little deeper (as of course we will), it seems Mr. Kennedy may be a very credible contender and have been manoeuvred into this position for a number of key strategic reasons.

First, full disclosure, as otherwise someone will inevitably dig this up as "evidence" of my own CO status - about three years ago, I briefly corresponded with Mr. Kennedy, as he included a letter I'd written in an article he published detailing his experiences trying to support the persecuted scientist, Professor Chris Exley. As well as being a friend of mine, Chris then worked at the university campus (Keele) upon which I'd grown up, and where I had family history going back many decades, so when I heard Keele had - quite extraordinarily and without precedent - rejected a personal check from RFK Jr. to support Chris' work, I wrote to Keele's Vice Chancellor to express my disappointment and shock. RFK did the same, and the whole correspondence was reproduced on his Children's Health Defense website.

After the publication of the article, I wrote to Mr. Kennedy to thank him for his invaluable work in this area, and for including my letter in his piece. He replied, "you are the best MIRI", and as it's not every day a future US presidential candidate says that to one, I thought I'd include it for posterity (and in case any of my former teachers are reading, many of whom failed to reach that particular conclusion about my merit themselves...). And that (which was in April 2020) marked the beginning and end of my interactions with "Bobby", and indeed, the entire Kennedy dynasty.

I do think Kennedy's work on vaccines is fantastic, and am also a big fan of his Children's Health Defense (CHD) website, which I often link others to. The press has recently, and inevitably, made much of how much money CHD brings in, but this reflects in the competence and professionalism of the resource - it has a real credibility and doesn't come across as too 'wacky' or fringe. CHD was a big inspiration for my own resource, Informed Consent Matters (alas, I did not have access to quite the finances RFK does, but I tried to emulate CHD's professional and clear style and tone).

So this is not a "hit piece" on RFK or his contributions to the vaccine safety fight - but rather, an investigative piece, asking, as ever, why him, why this, why now?

Ever since announcing his candidacy last week, RFK has received blanket press coverage around the world. Needless to say, much of this coverage focuses on his "anti-vax" activism (though to be clear, RFK has always made it clear he is not anti-vax - that he vaccinated all six of his children - but that he wants safe vaccines. We will return to this later). This may count as bad publicity right now (insofar as there can really be "bad publicity", which, in all honesty, there can't - if you want to kill a story, you ignore it - any kind of publicity, even negative, fans the flames of notoriety and tends to cause a star to rise - see Andrew Tate). Yet I don't believe this coverage will remain "bad press" for long.

As has been discussed at this site on several occasions, it seems we are in line for a "great reveal", which is gathering momentum all the time, leading up to formal acknowledgement on the world stage of how catastrophically harmful the Covid "vaccines" have been.

As Covid injection programmes around the world are quietly winding down, and mammoth vaccination centres close their doors, it's clear the establishment now feels, "job done". With billions of injections administered, the programme has fulfilled its true purpose - reducing the population by destroying fertility and reducing lifespan. Excess deaths continue to climb every week, and a new study estimates that a person fully "vaccinated" against Covid has reduced their life expectancy by 25 years.

But the establishment hasn't finished weaponising Covid injections just yet. The above was just phase one. Now we move into the second phase: exposure. More and more "mainstream" voices are coming forward to blow the whistle on Covid injection harms, with one celebrity doctor even getting these claims on BBC news. None of this is accidental and has all been scripted and signed off at the highest levels. Remember, a staged reveal of the vaccine harms was part of the modelling exercise on which "the pandemic" was based. It was always meant to come out.

Why? Well, because - as they are very open about - the ruling classes desire a "great reset", where the existing order is razed to the ground and replaced with a completely new system. In order to destroy the current system, they have to destroy all faith in it, so a strategic vaccine reveal is on the cards to demonstrate irrefutably that our current culture does not work: that it is so catastrophically and irretrievably broken that a lethally dangerous product was unleashed onto the world, which has had immeasurably tragic consequences that will continue for many decades, and this is all because of our broken, incompetent, not-fit-for-purpose system.

Obviously, the establishment will not admit the real truth - that the Covid pantomime was all an illusory hoax, staged to trick the masses into taking a lethal injection in order to meet depopulation goals (so in that sense - in terms of fulfilling its real goals - the system worked very well). It will be "cock up not conspiracy", but the takeaway will be - you cannot trust your dominant institutions or world leaders any more. They've proven themselves too stupendously stupid (Boris Johnson, PM of the UK during Covid, even declared recently, "I'm not a liar, I'm just a moron").

If, then, your current leaders were too idiotic to see how dangerous the rushed-through, experimental Covid injection programme really was.... your future leaders need to be people who did see it, and who called it out. That rules out Republican Trump, with his famous "Operation Warp Speed", and the other Republican presidential candidates are little-known and so appear to have little chance.

Thus, enter stage left: Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Scion of one of the most famous, beloved families in the world (perhaps even the most beloved, following the death of the Queen and all other scandals miring the Royal family), he is a veteran, credible, highly respected vaccine safety campaigner, within those circles. He didn't pop up five minutes ago, to latterly jump on the anti-vax bandwagon like all these celebrity grifters, he's been at this for years.

So the world's press are actually preparing a very positive presidential campaign for him. When the truth about Covid vaccine harms are formally revealed, and the world's populations are left reeling in shock and horror, they will immediately lose all trust and faith in those who recommended the injections - and will immediately look to those who warned against them. Not halfway through the vaccine campaign, as is the case for many mainstream voices speaking up now, but from the start. As, of course, RFK did.

Already, he is being set up for a victorious run, insofar as his competitor candidates are so utterly non-credible. We have Joe "senile creep" Biden (who has not as yet confirmed his run), and a woman named Marianne Williamson, a spiritual advisor who is primarily known for writing self-help books. Already, Williamson's campaign has been hit with severe controversy, with The Guardian reporting that her public message of love and compassion is undermined by behind-the-scenes reports of “foaming, spitting, uncontrollable rage”.

Speaking to Politico, 12 former staffers painted a picture of unpredictable anger, tending toward verbal and emotional abuse, beneath the bestseller’s promotion of spiritual calm.

"It would be foaming, spitting, uncontrollable rage,” said one former staffer who spoke on condition of anonymity. “It was traumatic. And the experience, in the end, was terrifying."

So it's very interesting that, already, the nominally "normie" press is working to discredit competitors to Kennedy. The only real gripe they have with him is his vaccine stance, but once he is vindicated as correct on that score (as he will be very soon), he becomes the clear forerunner and only genuinely credible candidate.

Remember that the presidential elections are not until November 2024, and a lot can happen in nineteen months. I may be wildly wrong, of course, but based on the facts currently available to me, I think it is very plausible to believe that there will be another Kennedy occupying the highest political office in the land two years from now.

As the vaccine harms are strategically revealed in the run up to the elections, he will gain huge public admiration and trust for blowing the whistle, and that will give him immense power to ultimately manoeuvre into place the next stage of the overlords' business plan, which we all know he is in favour of - the 'Green' agenda.

RFK has long been an outspoken proponent of climate change theory, stating in 2020 that:

"There are going to be major disruptions not just to humanity, but ultimately to civilization. This is part of the cost that we're paying for our longtime deadly addiction to coal and oil.”

On climate change, Kennedy Jr. voiced his support for a Green New Deal proposal put forward by Queens Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez but primarily called on governments to divest from fossil fuels and impose a tax for carbon emissions.

“I think the Green New Deal — and all that stuff — is important,” Kennedy Jr. says. “We ought to be pursuing it. My approach is more market-based than kind of top down dictates. You know, I believe that we should use market mechanisms like carbon taxes and the elimination of subsidies.”

We know that now they've finished with Covid, the next pantomime puppeteering the overlords intend to engage in is "climate change" fakery, using the hoax of manmade climate change, and the idea that "gas of life" CO2 is bad, to ruthlessly and dramatically shrink and curtail our lives, starting with 15-minute cities and other initiatives that comprise local governments' so-called "climate action plans" (please do Google the 100+ page reports from your own local council for details on these totally undemocratically decided, deeply sinister plans).

So to move this agenda forward, the world's most powerful political offices need to be occupied by people who are in favour of it, and who have won public trust by seeming to take on the establishment and uncover corruption.

"You can trust me because I told you the truth about the Covid injections," could be RFK's line. "So you can trust me on climate change, too."

And he may really, genuinely believe everything he says about climate change - many "good people" do, just as many good people were duped into taking the vaccines. Whether he really believes it or not is not really the point, though - the point is, if he's prepared to say on the world stage he does, he has the perfect credentials for the next stage of the agenda.

Also, please note, as he has repeatedly and expressly gone to great lengths to emphasise: he is not anti-vaccine. To quote Mr. Kennedy from his public correspondence to Keele University:

"I have always made it clear that I am not “anti-vaccine”. I want safe vaccines, robust science and uncorrupted regulators. By calling me “anti-vax”, vaccine companies seek to discredit, marginalize, silence me so as to prevent me from raising legitimate, urgent questions about the thoroughness of vaccine safety and efficacy assessments.

"I have never made a statement that could be legitimately construed as “anti-vaccine”. To the contrary, I have spent my 37-year career as an environmental and public health advocate fighting for evidence-based science, and science-based policy. I have prevailed in many hundreds of lawsuits against the world’s largest polluters and I have helped build, and currently run, the globe’s largest water protection group; Waterkeeper Alliance, the umbrella organization of 350 Waterkeepers in 48 nations—including the U.K. I spent much of the past three decades fighting to get mercury out of fish, pesticides out of food, and to decarbonize our energy system. No one calls me “anti-fish” , “anti-food”, or “anti-energy”. Nor should Pharma be given credence when it attempts to dismiss me as “anti-vaccine” simply because I have challenged the use of toxic metals such as mercury and aluminum in vaccines."

So there you have it: Mr. Kennedy is not anti-vaccine, he just wants "safe" vaccines.

It is the opinion of this author, however, that such things cannot exist, and that the whole vaccination programme was a fraud from the start, based on pseudoscience and quackery to give the world's governments an excuse to inject infants with various toxins for the purposes of population control (reducing IQ, subduing fertility, and so on).

I do understand that there can be strategic reasons for people saying "I'm not anti-vaccine, but..." - however, I do think in Kennedy's case (as for most "big names"), he does mean it, and were he to become president, he would work to reform the vaccine industry so it is "safer", but would stay firmly in the Overton Window on this issue, e.g., the debate can only be "are vaccines safe enough", not "do we need vaccines at all".

Obviously, reforming and improving the insanely dangerous and barely regulated vaccine industry is better than doing nothing, but improving safety standards will only mean less avoidable severe injury. It won't mean none, because you can only ever make vaccines safeR, you can never make them 'safe'. As the supreme court in the USA ruled, the intervention is, by its very nature, "unavoidably unsafe". So you can never have a safe vaccine, any more than you can have vegan meat or teetotal alcohol. One might argue the risk is worth it if vaccines have provable, significant benefits, but if you actually look into the evidence, you will find that they don't. By far the healthiest populations of children are those who are completely unvaccinated. Vaccines do not reduce all-cause sickness or mortality in children: on the contrary.

In conclusion, I think we can expect to see RFK's political star rise into the ascendancy, because he has all the credentials that make him a perfect fit for the next stage of the agenda - he's from a big-name, well-loved celebrity dynasty (high-profile politics and celebrity status being inextricably entwined): he's all in favour of the so-called green agenda and climate alarmism, and - by his own repeated admission - he's pro-vaccine.

Thanks for reading! This site is 100% reader-funded, with no paywalls, adverts, or wealthy corporate backers, meaning your support is what powers this site to keep going. If you would like to make a contribution of any size, please do so through...

1. BuyMeACoffee for one-off or monthly donations
2. Patreon, for monthly pledges
3. Direct bank transfer, for either monthly or one-off donations, to Nat West, a/c 30835984, s/c 54-10-27, account name FINCH MA

Your support is what enables this site to continue to exist, and is enormously appreciated. Thank you.