While tomorrow's proverbial fish-wrappers are busy baiting the public with breathless "revelations" about ministerial mockery and lies during Covid ("revelations" that your local friendly conspiracy theorists tirelessly shared through every act of the pandemime), there is another, even more sinister theme increasingly snaking through the press.

After the theatrical Bulley crime-drama thriller gripped audiences around the world, with edge-of-your-seat suspense and plot twists (was she abducted? did the boyfriend do it? is it her own fault for being an alcoholic hormonal mess? Tune in to a street theatre - I mean, news stand - near you tomorrow for more!), we have an even more grave situation - a missing baby - an aristocratic baby, no less - who has, tragically, now been found dead.

The case of the missing baby, along with her aristocratic mother and convicted rapist father, seemed to have all the ingredients to grip the public's attention, ever since it was first nationally reported that the family was "missing".

Again, and as has been reiterated on this site many times, the sad reality is that people go missing all the time (well over 150,000 every year), and very few of them merit a mention even in their local papers, never mind sensationalist splash headlines in the national media.

So, whenever that happens - national media coverage of a missing persons' event - it is always because there's a wider agenda at play, beyond simple "concern for the family". The media is not concerned about anyone's family (Milly Dowler, anyone? Or the countless other families gutter vulture "journalists" have used and abused to shift newspapers?). The media is concerned, at best, with making money, but more specifically and sinisterly, in doing the bidding of the ultra-wealthy autocrats who own all mainstream media vehicles. With making money a secondary concern (they already have more than they could spend in 1,000 lifetimes), those who own and direct the media use it for one thing and one thing only - to manipulate the thoughts and behaviours of the public. To "manufacture consent" (a political system of crowd control, by which mass media vehicles are used as "effective and powerful ideological institutions that carry out a system supportive propaganda function... without overt coercion").

So what are they trying to manufacture our consent for with the tragic missing baby, the high-profile, race-against-time search and rescue mission that ultimately failed?

Just like with Nicola Bulley, they are using this to manufacture a clamour for increased state surveillience of our lives.

If you study the details of the missing baby case, it is clear that the message we are being given is that this terrible tragedy could have been avoided, if only the family hadn't gone "off grid". If only they were more trackable.

The mother concealed her pregnancy and gave birth at home, failing to register the birth of the child. She and her partner then went on the run, before eventually abandoning the baby in a shed, where she later died.

It's a terrible, heart-wrenching tragedy.

Yet how could we possibly avoid something like this happening again in future? After all, we only know which women are pregnant and when their babies are born, because they choose to engage with authorities and tell them. So it is perfectly possible - as this dreadful case demonstrates - for a woman to be pregnant and give birth in secret, with no outside agencies aware of the birth - therefore putting the child at risk: perhaps the ultimate risk.

That means untold numbers of children could be being born, and dying, in secret, with wider society none the wiser.

So how do we stop this? How do we ensure, if troubled, mentally ill women with convicted rapist partners, become pregnant, that they are not able to conceal this and ultimately risk their child's life?

There's only one way of doing that: it has to be ensured that all women of child-bearing age are fitted with a chip that monitors bodily functions and sends a message to a centralised authority if that woman becomes pregnant. This allows said authorities to engage with the woman, to offer support, and to be sent a notification when she is about to give birth. It's all for the safety of mother and child, you see, because without the benevolent state to keep tabs on their every bodily fluctuation 24 hours a day, how are we going to stop these crazy women hooking up with rapists, having secret pregnancies, and allowing their children to perish?

If you think this sounds like a particularly fanciful form of science-fiction (and I agree - it does), please note that internal chips that can monitor bodily functions are already "a thing" As the online magazine, Digital Trends, reports:

"Smartwatches and other wearables are getting better and better when it comes to monitoring our vital signs and other biometrics. But what if, instead of strapping on a wearable, users were instead able to monitor their body processes by injecting a wireless, implantable chip to measure their health from the inside of their bodies? And what if said chip was almost unimaginably small, around the size of a dust mite and visible only when examined under a microscope?"

Welcome to the Internet of Bodies and our transhumanist future, where everyone is constantly connected and always online - but in a way that they can never switch off. All for their safety, right? Because, of course, implantable microchips controlled by shadowy Big Tech firms are only ever about keeping people safe. As the Digital Trends article continues:

"Currently, the chips can be used for sensing temperature. This work is initially being done as part of a larger effort looking at ways to monitor wound healing, although the potential applications go way beyond that. Shepard noted that, “lots of other things can be sensed here, and we are actively working on these. One of the most intriguing is specific recognition of biomarkers.” Some of the biomarkers they’re interested in gathering include blood pressure, glucose, and respiration, among others."

Biomarkers such as... pregnancy?

When I've postulated the idea of injectable chips to "keep us safe" in the past, some have objected with, "but the government can already track our every move with the mobile phones everyone carries everywhere".

Yes indeed - so why do you think it was such a seminal detail in the Nicola Bulley story that she left her mobile phone on a bench?

The message is loud and clear: people can, and do, get separated from their phones, and so when they are most needed as a tracking device - such as when bright, bubbly, pretty young mums go missing walking the dog - phones become useless.

So, we obviously need a kind of tracking device that people can't become separated from.

Of course, that - implanted tracking software that cannot be removed - would have enabled us to find the mythical Madeleine McCann long ago, too, instead of having to endure all these cranks who keep pretending to be her - with the latest probable impostor officially taking the longest DNA test in the history of the world. As I mentioned at the time, splashing this woman's story all over the papers prior to said DNA test being done was strategic - obviously, if the test is negative, there is no story: DNA tests are quick and cheap and so this story could have been put to bed in a matter of hours without ever getting any press attention.

But it was given massive press attention (and we STILL don't know the DNA results, when these typically take about two days to process), because - while I think it highly unlikely this Polish woman will turn out to be Madeleine - it's about installing the idea in the public's mind that she might still be out there, alive and well - so, when she is eventually found, the sensationalist story arc can finally conclude with, "and all this terrible trauma, tragedy and loss -including the family being taunted with all these mentally unwell impostors - could have been avoided if Madeleine had just been chipped!".

Just as we could have saved tragic baby Victoria if her wayward mother had been chipped through her pregnancy, and Victoria herself chipped immediately upon delivery. Even if the parents had absconded thereafter, the authorities could still have tracked Victoria to the shed and found her in time to save her.

And what kind of monster are you if you oppose a scheme like this, that could save babies from dying, children from being abducted, mothers from drowning in rivers?

Needless to say, chipping the general populace doesn't actually have anything to do with augmenting their health or keeping them safe - that will just be the slick PR used to sell it.

The real reason is to give those who implant the chip a complete and ruthless degree of control beyond the wildest imaginings of history's worst, most authoritarian tyrants.

A chip that monitors all bodily functions can give detailed information to a centralised authority about your diet, how much exercise you take, whether you are taking prescribed medications, and more - and so, as we move ever closer to a social credit system, all of these things could be used against you. Cholesterol a bit too high? No more meat for you this month. Skipped your morning jog? You've lost your weekly pass out of your 15-minute city. And so on and so forth.

But the most sinister bit of all is that once this kind of injectable tech is well developed enough (and I suspect it either already is, or will be very soon), whoever controls it literally has your life in their hands

Already ten years ago, the concept of a "wirelessly controlled pharmacy that dispenses drugs from within your abdomen" had been developed. Describing the concept, the online magazine Popular Science said:

"In the future, implantable computerized dispensaries will replace trips to the pharmacy or doctor’s office, automatically leaching drugs into the blood from medical devices embedded in our bodies. These small wireless chips promise to reduce pain and inconvenience, and they’ll ensure that patients get exactly the amount of drugs they need, all at the push of a button."

We don't really need to spell out why that's so utterly terrifying, do we? Well, first of all, as with all technology, mistakes will inevitably happen, leading to the wrong medications being dispensed, or the wrong doses, including fatal overdoses.

But even more terrifying is that this will obviously happen non-accidentally, too. It's the biggest open secret in the world that the global architects of civilisation are currently in the midst of dismantling that civilisation by drastically reducing the population. Giving these same psychopaths a remote control to the world's bodies, allowing them to dispense whatever toxic concoctions they like, whenever they like, is unthinkable in its dystopian evil.

So, that's why, no matter how many heart-string-pulling massive media events there are about missing mothers, abducted toddlers, even tragic, needlessly deceased babies - and there will be many - we must never submit to this agenda. We must never respond (as somebody did to me on Twitter) "but that baby would probably still be alive it she had been chipped!".

The overlords will cynically manipulate the public's natural protective instincts towards children to manufacture mass consent to get, in the first instance, all children (and "vulnerable" adults) chipped - moving quickly to all of us. And at that point - when they can control every most intimate aspect of our lives with the touch of a remote control button - we have reached endgame and they have won. So, we must see through this agenda now and oppose it at all costs, because, just like everything else the ruthless ruling classes purport to do "for our safety", the real reason they're doing it has nothing to do with safety, nothing to do with health, and is all about ensuring full spectrum dominance and control over our lives. A level of control that could - and inevitably, and rapidly, would - be used to lethal effect. The human condition can never be made completely "safe", we can never fully erase the experience of illness, tragedy, and loss, and nor is this a desirable goal.

As we said so many times throughout the "pandemic" - the point is not to "stay safe" - the point is to stay human.

Thanks for reading! This site is 100% reader-funded, with no paywalls, adverts, or wealthy corporate backers, meaning your support is what powers this site to keep going. If you would like to make a contribution of any size, please do so through...

1. BuyMeACoffee for one-off or monthly donations
2. Patreon, for monthly pledges
3. Direct bank transfer, for either monthly or one-off donations, to Nat West, a/c 30835984, s/c 54-10-27, account name FINCH MA

Your support is what enables this site to continue to exist, and is enormously appreciated. Thank you.