So it's here at last: what all us crazy fringe basement-dwellers have been saying for years (and I actually have a basement, well a cellar, fully wired up and everything, and have considered relocating there in the event of nuclear war / invading armies / descending aliens, or should any other of the spoiler alerts formerly known as conspiracy theories come true...).
Andrew Bridgen, MP for North West Leicestershire, is currently splashed across all the papers for having shared on social media a statement comparing the mRNA jab rollout to the Holocaust. This follows Bridgen's recent address to parliament, where he called for a "complete suspension" of all Covid vaccines, based on "robust data of significant harms and little ongoing benefit".
Needless to say, Bridgen is absolutely right, as study after study has confirmed, and echoing what we "conspiracy theorists" (e.g, those not impervious to recognising the blatantly obvious nor using rudimentary logic) have been saying from the start: the Covid injectables are not, and never were, "vaccines" - prophylactics meant to prevent disease - they are, and always were, a depopulation weapon meant to subdue fertility and expedite death. We now have the real-world data to confirm they do not perform as disease preventatives at all (the NHS currently being under more pressure than it has been since records began), but do correlate with ever-increasing excess deaths across all heavily vaccinated countries.
The damage is so extensive and so devastating, it was always obvious "the truth" (or rather, a 'limited hangout' version of it) was going to come out eventually, and as I've been saying for months, this - 'the Great Reveal' - was always part of the plan: a necessary precursor to 'The Great Reset'. To sum: we are meant to lose all trust and faith in existing institutions (the government, the NHS, etc.), so they can be destroyed and swept aside, to make way for something completely new (world order).
But, you may object, Bridgen's comments are being condemned! He has been extensively chastised and stripped of the Party Whip, and is currently serving a five-day suspension from his party.
That's true, but do you think these world stage masters, veteran producers of some of the most captivating political theatre in all of history, don't know how to tell a good story?
The would-be hero doesn't just challenge the corrupt establishment and instantly save the day, after all. Look at any good courtroom drama or big-budget espionage thriller. He has to encounter resistance, or there would be no story. Any screenwriter worth their salt understands the kind of story arcs that appeal to people, and that what we enjoy most of all is the experience of "tension and release".
When we go to the cinema to see our favourite action hero save the world yet again, we want to see him challenged, persecuted, thwarted at every turn - we want the tension and suspense to build and build - before, finally, in a jaw-dropping crescendo full of surprises and plot twists, he triumphs and saves the day. That's just how heroic saviour stories go, and they don't hold our full attention or draw our maximal support if they don't.
Imagine if Bridgen had just walked into parliament and said, "the jabs are killing everyone and they need to be stopped", and parliament just responded with, "oh, alright then".
That wouldn't interest people nearly as much as a real saviour story, nor would it be plausible as a narrative: it's not plausible that ruthlessly powerful evil establishments just roll over at the first challenge from the little guy. So, they have to do it like this. Bridgen has to encounter fierce opposition and fury, to build up his mythical hero status (all heroes have to endure persecution to solidify their saviour status later on), and to further demonise the existing establishment as irredeemably corrupt to its core (so it has to be permanently done away with) once the truth is finally acknowledged.
Because always remember: there's no such thing as bad publicity. There really isn't. As legacy media editors know all too well, the real way to crush a story, a movement, a person is to starve them of the lifeblood they need to remain relevant and draw support - publicity - not to plaster them all over the front pages so they are literally the only thing anyone is talking about. It is precisely the same phenomenon we saw with Andrew Tate, as I detailed earlier this month.
Interestingly, these two persecuted would-be heroes and saviours, share the name Andrew, which means brave, strong, warrior.
We are being sold heroes ("when the people want a hero, we shall supply him" - Albert Pike) and the world stage screenwriters are telling us loud and clear that's what they are: first of all, by putting them through their requisite period of attack and persecution, and secondly, even by what they're called - 'Andrew'. Their names literally mean brave warriors. Our saviours are here!
Now, an interesting thing to note about Mr. Bridgen, is the below:
What this image is telling you (because they're always required to tell us what they're really doing), is that this whole thing is Masonic theatre. Put simply, high-level social engineers, who are very often Freemasons, stage events on the world stage and pass them off as real, in order to propagandise the public. This, by the way, is a completely legal thing to do, and as veteran journalist and political campaigner, Dr. Naomi Wolf, explains in this brief (9-minute) lecture, the political classes do it all the time.
As Wolf says, ""We have entered an era in which it is not crazy to assess news events to see if they're real or not real… In fact, it's kind of crazy not to."
So, Bridgen is now playing the part of "persecuted saviour hero" for his Masonic masters (having previously played the role of 'eager jab recipient'), just as Andrew Tate is, too.
Andrew Tate is allegedly currently residing in a "hellhole Romanian prison", where, remarkably, he is able to frequently compose Tweets, and the papers eagerly update us on every latest dramatic turn of events in this wholly scripted saga, therefore further building his profile as brutally oppressed hero of the people who is being framed for challenging the evil establishment.
Tate, by the way, will eventually be found completely innocent, because this whole thing is theatre - scripted, staged, acted - to raise his star and media profile. Working exceptionally well, isn't it (after all, just how many people who hadn't a clue who he was this time last month, know who he is now?).
What you may not be aware of regarding Mr. Tate, however, is that he has become a frequent topic of discussion in the nation's schools, due to the fact he is apparently 'radicalising' teenage boys and inducting them into such regressive and patriarchal views that they are beginning to refuse to be taught by female teachers.
A professional teacher trainer, who provides training sessions at schools regarding challenging sexism and promoting violence-free relationships, says:
'Since September every training session I have done teachers have mentioned [Tate's] name...
'Teachers have said that when the pupils talk about him they kind of puff out their chests like that they represent him. There is definitely the idea that he is some kind of avatar for them.
'The teachers talk about how his influence is palpable and there are very few young men that are not aware of his work.'
That is a phenomenal level of influence on the next generation, and it hasn't happened by accident. That incredible level of notoriety never does. Tate is being set up as the saviour-hero for the upcoming cohort of disenfranchised young men who - as Jordan Peterson has identified - have become increasingly lost and sidelined in the dominant social narrative about equal opportunities and women's rights.
Boys and young men have increasingly struggled, doing worse at all levels of education (it being no secret the schooling system better suits girls), and facing other social difficulties (especially around family breakdown and child custody issues, where women are seen to have the upper hand), and it is all coming to an (engineered) head.
Andrew Tate has been described by schools as a 'Pied Piper' , and this is right - that's exactly what he is. But where is he leading his mesmerised charges? To luxurious lifestyles of fast cars and beautiful women? Or... something else? Here is a picture of Andrew Tate, on his way to court to appeal his recent arrest. Can you see what he is holding in his hands?
It's a copy of the Quran. It is publicly known that Tate has converted to Islam, but it is not a form of Islam that most Muslims would recognise. Rather, Tate has stated that "ISIS are the real Muslims"
He appears to advocate an extremely militant and ultra-conservative form of the religion, endorsing the Talibanesque view that women should not be in the workplace but at home raising children.
Expressing support for Tate, the pro-ISIS Bariqah News Agency shared Tate's TikTok video on its Telegram account, commenting:
"Andrew Tate – 99.99% of the world's women hate him because he is against feminists and says that a woman's place is in the home, and that she should obey the man. [Then] Andrew Tate announces his conversion to Islam [and] there was a massive influx of tweets by women affiliated with Islam who curse him, including some who announced they would leave Islam because Tate joined... Good, let them be replaced... No, we have in the video clip above Andrew Tate before his conversion to Islam acknowledging that the men of the Islamic State are the real Muslims and no one besides them, because they adhere to the teachings of the Qur'an and Sunna literally, while those who read the Qur'an and disregard its teachings are not really Muslims."
All this is completely in line with my predictions that we are rapidly approaching a point in our culture where there is a dramatic social shift - from the 'peak liberalism' we have now (insane extremes of degenerate lunacy that nobody reasonable agrees with, e.g., Drag Queens performing for toddlers), to its exact opposite - ultra-conservatism, replete with super regressive and patriarchal attitudes, of the sort Tate espouses.
The thing is, Andrew Tate is very well versed in popular so-called "conspiracy theories", and has quite correctly stated that "women's lib" as an international movement was created and bankrolled by devious social engineers, for two primary purposes: 1) get women into the workplace where they can be taxed (when women were more often homemakers, their labour was untaxable), and 2) get both parents out of the house so the children can be put into state-run daycare ASAP and inducted into the values of the state.
The women's liberation movement in reality had nothing to do with improving women's lives - that was just the slick PR to make the public accept it - and all the data from the last sixty years confirms that it hasn't (women have got progressively unhappier and less fulfilled every decade since the 1970s). In reality, it was all about widening the tax base, reducing the birth rate (career women have less children), and getting children to accept the state, rather than the family, as primary guiding authority in their lives - and it has achieved these things very successfully.
While a small and privileged elite of women may have benefited from women's liberation - able as they are to pursue high-powered and glamorous careers whilst paying for nannies and private education for their children - ordinary women largely haven't benefited at all, as now they are expected to be full-time wage-earners in often tedious jobs AND run a home and take care of children. While it should go without saying that all opportunities should be open to all qualified people to pursue, and women should - of course - have all the same access to education and employment as men, it's nevertheless obvious who has really benefited wholesale from women's lib, and that's the social engineers who invented it so they could fleece the public out of more money.
So when Tate exposes that this is what "women's lib" was really about, he has the truth on his side. Which makes him a particularly dangerous and subversive force when he takes it to an illogical conclusion - that, therefore, Western countries should plunge themselves into the worst extremes of ultra-regressive conservatism instead. We can recognise that certain social trends have been planned for nefarious reasons, without doing a complete 180 the other way - but that is not the plan. The 180 social flip is the plan, and it will gain legitimacy by basing some of its founding principles on facts, such as why the West really introduced feminism.
Of course, it is no coincidence (these don't exist on the world stage) that the US recently withdrew from Afghanistan, abandoning its mission to bring the country liberal democracy, and leaving it instead to return to medievally misogynist (certainly very non-feminist) attitudes - whilst parts of the UK are passing ultra-misogynist legislation that will erase women from public life just as effectively as The Taliban's approach of banning women from everything outside the home will.
The cultural winds are changing very rapidly all over the globe, and Andrew Tate (the "brave, strong" - currently "unjustly persecuted" - warrior) is here to spearhead a cultural and religious revolution where we will all be inducted into ultra-strict Islamism.
Predictive programming The Handmaid's Tale gave a very clear blueprint of what the social engineers have got in store for us, it's simply the "real life" version will use a twisted version of Islam, rather than a twisted version of Christianity.
Well, hang on a minute, you may very well say, what's all this got to do with Andrew Bridgen and the Covid vaccine?
So there is very significant crossover here, with extremist religious ideology and opposition to vaccination. The harms of the vaccine are currently being revealed on the world stage - with, as I say, the requisite period of resistance and persecution of hero whistle-blowers first - whilst fundamentalist Islam is gaining strongholds in various locations worldwide, as well as being brought to the West by - amongst others - Andrew Tate (who is fulfilling the critical role of making it appealing to the next generation).
We also have thousands of military-aged young men from hardliner Islamic countries currently stationed in the nation's hotels.
This is all inevitably leading up to something, which can be roughly summarised as 'The Great Demolition'. Eventually the truth (limited hangout version) about the Covid vaccines will be acknowledged on the world stage, and that Bridgen's 'Holocaust' comparisons were accurate.
Horror, fury, and complete social disarray will ensue, as the brutally betrayed people take to the streets, violently rioting and demanding change, a situation that will be agitated by the strategically located UN military assets currently in every major city in the country awaiting orders.
The government will be overthrown (and a lot of this will be acted - staged - but it will look very real), the major perpetrators brought to account (or we will be told they've killed themselves, and they'll be given a new identity and shipped off for another role), and a new, very religious regime will be installed, which will appear to have legitimacy since they exposed the terrible evils our our previous regime and exposed all the corruption and depravity in our alleged liberal democracy.
That's more or less what we seem to be heading for, and there are many other clear clues that we are intended to become an ultra-Islamist republic, such as, the ongoing dramedy that is the Harry 'n' Meghan show, which I've maintained from the start is more socio-political theatre with the ultimate aim of bringing down the monarchy (which isn't compatible with future "one world government" goals). That's why Harry's so-called "memoir" has already been exposed as very transparent fiction - since the whole thing is, and was from the start (Meghan is an actress, just playing another role). We are to become a republic, and that's what all the high-profile "Royal drama" is really all about. It's also why Prince Andrew has been exposed, rather than protected, as his type usually are.
We can also see our pub industry collapsing, with the spiralling bills for the venues themselves, coupled with reduced footfall resulting both from the cost of living crisis and relentless train strikes, meaning 50 pubs are closing every month.
The engineered collapse of this industry is in line with the strict alcohol prohibition that exists in Islamist countries, with the consumption of alcohol in Islamic Saudi Arabia being punishable by public flogging, fines, or lengthy imprisonment.
It was not, of course, a coincidence (to repeat: on the world stage, there are none) that the recent World Cup was held in Islamic Qatar, which has very strict rules on alcohol consumption, meaning the long-established British tradition of drinking many pints whilst watching the football was abruptly stymied. While alcohol is not completely illegal in Qatar, it is very strictly limited (and expensive) and there are serious punishments for being under the influence in public. There are no pubs or clubs - institutions so central to the social and cultural life of Britain.
Also note that, in recent months, the trendy tourist destination of Indonesia - third-biggest democracy in the world - has outright banned sex before marriage, for tourists as well as residents. This country - which had already outlawed adultery - is overwhelmingly (87%) Muslim. These new laws are not compatible with democratic countries, where the state does not dictate how people should organise their personal lives, but they are fully sharia law compliant. You will note that, in very recent UK history, there was a point where we were almost sharia law compliant in this way as well, as our government also criminalised casual sex.
One has to look at all these events as part of a bigger, intertwined picture, and realise that everything I have described above - the vaccine "holocaust" being revealed, the "persecution" of two hero Andrews, the rise of ultra-Islamism and much more conservative social attitudes worldwide, and the decline of un-Islamic British traditions such as the pub - are all related to each other, and all accelerating towards a dramatic crescendo.
We are in the midst of an enormous social and cultural revolution, and in navigating it as best we can and adapting to the new challenges without breaking under their weight, we must be as aware as we can about what is going on. Shock is utterly disabling - that's why so many froze with panic and fear when the so-called "pandemic" began. "Conspiracy theorists" didn't, though, because we knew it was coming. I related in April 2019 my prediction that a fake pandemic was imminently to make its debut, for purposes of population control through a bioweapon injection, and generally increased social control, and that we needed to be ready for some "dark days" ahead.
As such, I did not experience panic or fear when this began to occur, because I had expected it, so was able to navigate it quite well, refusing to bend to the tyranny and helping others to resist, too. So, that is why I dedicate time to spotting "clues" and seeing patterns now - to help others understand what is likely around the corner, to give us time to digest it and prepare, rather than being blindsided with paralysing shock because we didn't anticipate it.
So please, do see the clues, spot the patterns, and take this vital time to prepare. There are undoubtedly some tough times ahead, but that's why you and I are here now - to play a critical role in this epic battle for the very soul of our society and its future.
(Or to hide in the basement - I mean, presuming I can get WiFi down there - I haven't quite decided yet...)
Thanks for reading! This site is 100% reader-funded, with no paywalls, adverts, or wealthy corporate backers, meaning your support is what powers this site to keep going. If you would like to make a contribution of any size, please do so through...
Your support is what enables this site to continue to exist, and is enormously appreciated. Thank you.